|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Analogue Source Turntables, Tonearms, Cartridges, Phono Stages, Tuners, Tape Recorders, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#9371 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
On the irrational and purely subjective side of argument, it's "special" because quite rare on my side of continent. On more objective side, it's external feedback proof and the tank like rigid build that I like the most. But if I'm permitted to turn the question, what's not to like in it?
|
|
|
|
#9372 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#9373 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2012
|
Does anyone know a good source for a matched k369 pair?
Spencer did have some, but I was too slow. The other parts are on their way at least. |
|
|
|
#9374 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
dual 170's will serve you well. I am going to try the 369, but do not expect huge difference. Bigger difference will probably come from cap selection and RIAA optimization, but this is just my opinion. Salas may have a different and more informed answer.
__________________
|F6 Kit/Trasnformer GB Sign up sheet Closed,|Primrose GB Sign Up sheetClick Here ...Shape the sound , Man! |
|
|
|
#9375 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Melbourne (Oz, not Florida!)
|
Quote:
![]() Quote:
I'm thinking Kuzma, Brinkman, SME ... to say nothing of the LP12. ![]() Regards, Andy |
||
|
|
|
#9376 | |
|
diyAudio Chief Moderator
|
Quote:
2SK369BL are better performing on phono noise measurements in bass and upper bass due to less self noise in lower frequencies. I have only used those up to now in the folded so I cant tell you if the difference is subjectively too important VS 2x2SK170BL. Those who have used 2x2SK170BL are reporting they are very happy anyway, so its not end of the world if 369less. 1X369 is ~58dB phono, 2x170 is 60dB, 2x369 is 63dB. Particular gain choice build may be matching better to a cart and that is an important criterion too. |
|
|
|
|
#9377 |
|
diyAudio Chief Moderator
|
They are nicely true to instrumental tone and voices, can listen long while following intricate clues without stress, the dynamics are tame and the bass rather sluggish. No opportunity with TSSA on them yet, I see that friend not too often anyway, but from being driven by the VT200 MKI I feel they are asking maybe for a 100W amp to be vigorous. They must be something like 85dB sensitivity the way they behave.
|
|
|
|
#9378 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Mine are not Harbeths, although same BBC family descendants and quite match your description. Sensitivity is higher, still I'm affraid TSSA might have less power than needed to move them. I'm on my way to find out, anyways.
|
|
|
|
#9379 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2012
|
Quote:
IŽll be back when **** hits the fan. e |
|
|
|
|
#9380 |
|
diyAudio Chief Moderator
|
Yours are Spendor S100 if I remember well? At 89dB/W/m as measured by Atkinson they should be much more comfortable than SHL5 with a circa 50W amp. Current delivery and damping factor from just a couple of drain out Mosfets in a low negative feedback amp won't be spectacular but your speaker does not dip impedance too violently. You will evaluate in time.
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
| New To Site? | Need Help? |