|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Analogue Source Turntables, Tonearms, Cartridges, Phono Stages, Tuners, Tape Recorders, etc. |
|
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#8481 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
these moving plate caps do indeed have air as the mojor dielectric and as such should be better than any plastic film dielectric.
But unfortunately there is some insulation between the plates, even in the metal framed variables. That will give some of the effect of the insulator dielectric. Any idea what proportion of the total capacitance is air based cf, insulator based? Much like the foamed teflon, or air cell in a coax. Air is the substantial medium. |
|
|
|
#8482 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Hi guys
Yeah...it wasn't really a question about specific cartridge loading... ...more about peoples experience with trimmer caps. I said 'air-caps'...cos that's what people tend to call them. However the high-quality Philips one mentioned... ...seems to have plates, with PTFE between them. I have never had the chance to examine one of these trimmers... ...but judging by the price RS Components charge for them in the UK, they are probably the best made available. Just a guess, but having something like PTFE between the plates, is possibly better than air. My father said to me years ago, he thought traditional 'air-caps' might well 'drift' as the old big radio types did... ...due to warming & possible humidity or drying of it, between the plates. I guess PTFE between the plates, largely stops anything like this. As I said, not really a cartridge question... ...but the cartridge is going to most likely be a high MC, such as the Denon DL-160 or DL-110. At some point, the tonearm & TT wiring will be re-done also. I have been looking at some options for this... ...and see the 'Kynar' wire-wrap cable is quite popular. Also I recently aquired a sample amount of extremely low pF cable... ...of a possibly interesting construction for lead-out cable. This possibly won't now be used however... ...as the TT re-wire will now probably be 'semi-balanced'... ...ie. 2 wires, with overal shield ( microphone-cable ) & XLR plugs; with shield connected at one end only ( we have some exellent cable for this already, low pF, I think ). I haven't tried the single-ended low pF cable for anything yet... ...but for anyone interested, it is Klotz 'La Grange' (AC110), intended for guitar use. A most unusual cable for such applications I think ( studio only ), since the centre conductor is in fact solid-core. Extremelly low pF ( I think ) of only 70pF / metre. In a nut-shell... ...the TT re-wire may well end up being 'non-typical'... ...hence the interest of tunability. Since there are no series signal-path connections & these devices are intended for precision adjustment, I can't see they would be any worse than DIP-switch solutions, or RCA load-plugs. Anyhow... ...I'm just going through my parts choice quite carefully for the NJFET. Checking out new things, I haven't used before... ...and also looking at new interesting suppliers ( ie. NOT RS Components etc. ) many of which are in China, and consequently have l o n g delivery times. Cheers Si. |
|
|
|
#8483 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Just another thought...
...sorry, we're always trying to 'think between the lines' on these kinda things. The Klotz 'La Grange' (AC110) apart from having only 70pF / metre... ...also has very good, electrostatic + copper shielding... ...and an incredibly low resistance, of only 0.085 Ohms / metre. You could say, just start with 3 metres of it... ...and just 'trim' the cable, bit by bit, to tune-in the cartridge. Just an idea. Cheers Si. |
|
|
|
#8484 |
|
diyAudio Chief Moderator
|
If its an MC don't bother, if ts an MM just changing the load resistor value when having 1-1.5m signal cable capacitance can give significant response changes before resorting to extra input capacitance loading.
|
|
|
|
#8485 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Bucharest
|
Salas, I'm using the simplistic like you designed for me but now i have some 2sk170's in my hand with Idss around 6mA. If i replace them in the circuit do i need to change some resistor values ? Also i would like to have a bit more gain to not have so much difference from CD player.
|
|
|
|
#8486 |
|
diyAudio Chief Moderator
|
We will see about it ASAP.
|
|
|
|
#8487 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Bucharest
|
There is no hurry. If i have those GR's 6mA makes sense to order BL's ?
|
|
|
|
#8488 |
|
diyAudio Chief Moderator
|
They are more than enough strong for your application. Here are the modifications. You will get 5-6dB more also.
|
|
|
|
#8489 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
|
parachuting on this thread... (having just read the main pdf file).
Is there any particular advantage of the higher voltage version on the original pdf file over the 24V version above (considering equivalent supplies)? I wonder if I can pick up from here (ie from the above schematics) with no disadvantage over what went on previously. I suppose the Q1,2, and 5 must be matched for 6mA, right? Also, can I ask why the use of LEDs instead of regular diodes? |
|
|
|
#8490 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
|
for the original pdf I mean the link (not the attachment) in the first post of this thread.
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
| New To Site? | Need Help? |