|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Analogue Source Turntables, Tonearms, Cartridges, Phono Stages, Tuners, Tape Recorders, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1101 | |
|
diyAudio Chief Moderator
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#1102 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Just did the 330pF mod and now everything is getting into the right place. Now I will play with the cart loading. Amazing ! Ricardo
__________________
RC |
|
|
|
|
#1103 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Hello Riccardo,
There isn' t any330p on the schematic, where I can find this update? Do you had any problem with pcb?they was ok? Thanks a lot Guglielmo |
|
|
|
#1104 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Toronto
|
The only difference I noticed between the two versions of the regulator is that the power mosfets of the non-buffered one get very hot, even with a significant heat sink. The buffered version you mentioned above has cold mosfets; the darlington gets a little warm (I measured a 27 mA collector-emitor current). On the oscilloscope both show a nice regulated trace, and sound wise I could not notice any difference. The reason I mentioned it to salas was partly theoretical, furthermore, I like tweaking everything, no offense intended.
|
|
|
|
#1105 |
|
diyAudio Chief Moderator
|
Rather odd to have cold Mosfets if the CCS is running same current in both versions. I would expect the shunt Mosfet to be somewhat colder since the driver and the idss buffer would consume about 37mA above load consumption VS the standard one, lightening its constant burden. But I don't see how the CCS Mosfet running at same current and same Vin - Vout can show such a thermal difference. Plus if they share the same heatshink they would eventually come to about the same centigrade.
|
|
|
|
#1106 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
The original 46dB schematic indicates 16nF for C3 on the riaa circuit. As I was using 15.72nF, I added 330pF so I got 16.05nF. The result is very noticeable... I lost the frontal presentation of sax and trumpet, voices became less boxy and piano has a natural presentation. the 330p silver micas are burning nicely and the trebble is regaining it´s fluidity. The pcb is very good indeed... everything worked at the first time ! Now I will replace some resistors and work on a propper case with good connectors. Ricardo
__________________
RC |
|
|
|
|
#1107 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
|
Ricardo
__________________
Sic58
|
|
|
|
#1109 | |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Toronto
|
Quote:
salas, so have you formed an opinion about the ruskie ft-3s? |
|
|
|
|
#1110 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Toronto
|
However, I would like say that I am just exploring some of these variations, and to recommend to everyone to run the salas shunt regulator.
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
| New To Site? | Need Help? |