|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Analogue Source Turntables, Tonearms, Cartridges, Phono Stages, Tuners, Tape Recorders, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Budapest, Hungary
|
Is there any way to mechanically exciting the stylus in horizontal and/or vertical direction? I mean using some kind of transducer instead of playing an LP. The purpose would be to use a variable audio signal generator, find the resonance frequency and Q factor, then optimize the damping to get maximally flat response around the lower cutoff frequency. Would a piezo transducer do the job? I do not want to go beyond 100 Hz or so.
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I'm not sure I fully understand.
The interesting system is the pickup+tonearm combination as this sets the resonance frequency of the whole system. As the compliance of the pickup is generally known you just need to find the effective mass of your tonearm to calculate it. In general highly compliant systems go with light arms and necessarily perform poor with heavy ones - exactly as lowly compliant MCs need heavy arms. But if I just misunderstood you, please correct me! All the best, Hannes
__________________
fresh matched IRFP240/IRFP9240 fets || AlephJ/JX-kitsF5 transistor kits || Burning Amp BA-1/2/3 transistor kits |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Hi,
A test record with subsonic (< 20Hz) tones / warble tones does the job. A rig is possible but far too complicated for such a simple job, use the above. /sreten.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Budapest, Hungary
|
Hannes,
I want to check the transfer function of the arm/pickup combination. A test record with subsonic tracks is possible, actually I am using the HiFi News & Record Review test record for this purpose. But the problem is that it contains a sweep and the exact frequency and amplitude is difficult to determine. I want to measure the resonance peak amplitude related to the passband amplitude. Just like the low-frequency rolloff of a loudspeaker, where critical damping Q=0.7 results in the maximally flat response and Q=0.5 gives minimum group delay. I think this parameter (damping factor of the arm/pickup mechanical vibrating system) is ignored at turntables. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Hi,
Convert the frequency sweep into a digital file. Using "sample" editors it should be very easy to ascertain the information you are looking for. FWIW the parameter is not ignored in turntables. Cartridges have a highish Q for very good reasons. /sreten.
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
You just have to choose the correct cartridge for your tonearm - remember high compliant carts (typically MMs) for low-mass arms and low compliant carts (typically MCs) for high-mass arms. Then you got a mechanically perfect match, see for a calculator here ("Cartridge Resonance Evaluator") http://www.cartridgedb.com/ But don't forget that MMs need also to be correctly capacitively loaded, otherwise you will never get a flat frequency response. All the best, Hannes
__________________
fresh matched IRFP240/IRFP9240 fets || AlephJ/JX-kitsF5 transistor kits || Burning Amp BA-1/2/3 transistor kits |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Canandaigua, NY USA
|
I think you can do this, but it's not very easy if you don't have access to some pzt materials. I'd use a small disk made of "soft" piezoelectric ceramic to get maximum motion from the drive signal. Remember that these are almost purely capacitive, so the signal generator will have to be ok with such a load. Pretty sure you will also have to equalize it. Mount the disc on something more massive, say a 1/8" piece of brass, then set the stylus on the surface. It should be possible to tune through the resonance and measure the response. You might be able to do the same thing with a small tweeter- I've seen some that are very flat, less than 1/2". Just because they don't radiate at low frequencies doesn't mean the diaphragm isn't moving! I use a test record with a continuous sweep at a known rate- record the response and you can pin the frequency by time.
__________________
I used to be an audiophool like you but then I took an arrow to the knee. |
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Quote:
/sreten.
|
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Exciting new line of fullrange drivers from Feastrex | cdwitmer | Feastrex | 1896 | 22nd March 2012 12:16 AM |
| RS 40-1354A Exciting Find! | mikje | Full Range | 9 | 23rd December 2008 06:40 PM |
| Exciting project for CSS FR125s | Rafal | Full Range | 29 | 6th October 2006 03:46 AM |
| ff85 k exciting need other more efficiency | soulsheiksan | Full Range | 0 | 13th December 2005 03:54 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10250 seconds (78.15% PHP - 21.85% MySQL) with 10 queries |