Effective mass?? - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Source & Line > Analogue Source
Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Gallery Wiki Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Analogue Source Turntables, Tonearms, Cartridges, Phono Stages, Tuners, Tape Recorders, etc.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 4th August 2008, 07:47 AM   #1
dario54 is offline dario54  Israel
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Israel
Default Effective mass??

I'm building my own tone arm and found all considerations about the so called EFFECTIVE MASS of the tone arm related to the interfacing of a specific cartridge.

Can someone explain in detail how to get this value?

I can ONLY get the WEIGHT of the arm, section by section, in grams.

Any help will be apreciated, thanks.

  Reply With Quote
Old 4th August 2008, 11:27 AM   #2
sreten is offline sreten  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member RIP
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK

Starting with the headshell =100% multiply each section by its
% distance away from the pivot points at the base of the arm.
This will give you very near the total effective mass.

  Reply With Quote
Old 5th August 2008, 06:43 AM   #3
h_a is offline h_a  Europe
diyAudio Member
h_a's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Graz, Austria
Effective mass is just the inertia of the arm. You could get this value with respect to the tonearm axis by applying a specific torque and measuring the resulting oscillation frequency.

But I guess that's maybe beyond you want to do.

As a simple estimate, the weight of the headshell will largely dictate the effective mass, since its distance to the axis is largest. However this precedes that the weight of the arm (w/o headshell) is not significantly large.

Have fun, Hannes
High Octane phono preamp Wiki
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th August 2008, 11:34 AM   #4
sreten is offline sreten  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member RIP
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK

My post has a mistake, the method works out how to balance the arm.
The % distance needs to be squared for each section for effective mass.

  Reply With Quote
Old 5th August 2008, 04:25 PM   #5
AMV8 is offline AMV8  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: near london
Hi Dario

Good to hear that you are building an arm.

Are you thinking of including any damping of the arm at the pivot point or next to the cartridge? Silicon fluid is easy to buy as a damping fluid.

Some people, myself included, think that damping the arm is the easiest way to avoid movement of the arm. The arm movement that normally affects the sound most is the movement of the arm along its axis. A pivot point is not very good at resisting longitudional or lateral movement unless damped at the pivot point. Many manufacturers of expensive arms use a very tight tolerance bearing to resist arm movement. Unless you can find such a bearing ( it will be expensive ) then I think that damping is the best way to go.

  Reply With Quote
Old 5th August 2008, 09:55 PM   #6
diyAudio Member
Steerpike's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
Somewhere on the WWW I read a technique to measue the Eff Mass very acurately. I cannot now re-find it, but in summary it is:

Get a small, speaker - say 2-inch, a cheap fullrange, as used in budget headphones.

*Carefully* stick a knob of soft stationery putty (BluTak in the UK, Prestik locally, or Pritt GlueMagnet) onto the cone.

Connect to an audio oscillator and millivolt meter, and measure the resonant frequency.

Now place the speaker cone upward on the turntable and stick the cartridge - MINUS THE STYLUS, for safety) into the putty, so the arm & cone move as one.

Re-measure the resonant frequency, and do the necesary calculation to find the increased mass. This will be the effective mass, and not the 'gravitational mass' of the arm.
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th August 2008, 07:40 PM   #7
dario54 is offline dario54  Israel
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Israel
Thanx all fr the suggestions...

My problem is simple:

I got a used DIY unipivot and I'm trying to somehow update it fr the use with my Denon 103.

Actually it is quite short, maybe 8.5 inch, while I intend to have it much longer, maybe 11 or 12 inch.

The older arm (fm the cup holding the pivot) + shell (very minimalist) weight around 12 grams, the new one without shell, cable is 22 grams.

When thinking about the shell, I'm in doubt what solution prefer, considering the EFFECTIVE MASS of the whole arm.

Only thing that relievesme is the fact that 103 prefer heavy mass arms...

Will try to post some pictures to make myself more clear.

  Reply With Quote


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
effective mass IZHAKKATZ Analogue Source 18 3rd April 2016 10:50 AM
Please help with compliance and effective mass planarboy Analogue Source 22 21st February 2009 07:49 AM
40 grams effective mass arm? nghiep Analogue Source 10 25th January 2008 04:07 PM
effective pick up arm mass stewartwen Analogue Source 4 11th April 2006 05:22 PM
effective mass peterr Analogue Source 9 5th April 2002 02:52 PM

New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 05:27 AM.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2017 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2