|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Analogue Source Turntables, Tonearms, Cartridges, Phono Stages, Tuners, Tape Recorders, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
|
Hi there
I have searched the forum for similar discussions of a valid design but all has been a bit hazy. Basic unit specs: Two vari frequencies (for 33.3 and 45 rpm) Stable operation High current capability without strain Output voltage adjustable One-box solution (no odd pieces of amps and iPods This is what I have come up with. I am no electro guru but this is my best guess for a PSU to fit the above requirments. Wien-bridge oscillator with two fixed cap banks as per each speed for selection. Fed by a regulated PSU. TDA7249 IC Op-Amp as driver stage for motor/transformer - at least 5 amps capability. A super advanced PSU with processor control is not really nessesary (display etc). You want a stable supply to the motor (especially frequency). Anybidy care to expand on this and comment/make suggestions on the schematic. Like I said - I am no expert but this is my best guess. Dewald |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Geelong
|
If you are looking to run a single phase (induction) motor, don't use a class AB power op amp as the power amplifier. You will have a devil of a time compensating it due to the effect of the motor inductance on the feedback loop. T amps and their ilk are a far easier solution.
If you are looking to run a two phase (synchronous) motor splitting the two phases and establishing quadrature correctly is very important to optimal performance. I once used Wien bridge and then some more complex analogue oscillators (modified Fraser multiple phase shift) but the drift is difficult to control. Yes square waves are difficult to filter but Direct Digital Synthesis gets around that very neatly. Is the "one box solution" allowed to have multiple components inside? PS (or battery) > frequency generator > output amplifier(s) > transformer(s) There are good reasons for keeping the sections separate. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
|
Mark
I did not realize that the amp in the schematic is class A/B - the data sheet doesnt mention it. What is needed is a class B amp for best efficiency. Also looking at doing this oscillator solution than the above unit: http://www.maxim-ic.com/appnotes.cfm/an_pk/3846 A dual phase unit is not needed as the phase shift for AC Synch motors is done by a cap (but you knew that). I want a PSU with a single phase that will enable me to use it on a varety of AC motor turntables. Converting these tables to DC motor is not an option. The PSU must also have Low Voltage (12 - 24vac) and High Voltage (110v - 220v) output, selectable by a toggle switch. (Look at the puny "Speedboxes" from Pro-Ject) Last night I tried my 12vdc-to-230vac inverter on my turntable and the results were quite impressive! This is what I want - no need for an over-fancy device. A single box solution is also a must - clutter is not an option. Mains operated also a must. I think the inclution of an analogue voltage and frequency meter on the front could be a good idea. Maybe a ammeter as well. Dewald PS - Any tips for a high power class B amp in Chip form? |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Hampshire
|
Would this universal PSU be compatible with the Garrard 301 or 401... on paper?
![]() - John |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Geelong
|
I repeat: Do not use a class AB (or class B) power op amp for an induction motor, the inductance causes huge problems. Class D gives you better efficiency than Class B anyway.
I didn't say that a two phase supply was necessary, I said it was important to optimal performance. It is of course up to you what compromises in performance you will accept. |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
|
Quote:
D |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: UK
|
"Fun" solution: How about a tube or two driving a mains transformer (with the tube being fed by the oscillator)
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
|
Quote:
You may certainly experiment with a tube PSU but I would rather go SS. I think Mark Kelly made a tube PSU for a Garrard 301...? D |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
|
Quote:
D |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
|
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| mains regeneration | mikee55 | Power Supplies | 6 | 17th June 2007 07:50 AM |
| AC Power Regeneration anybody? | Peter Daniel | Solid State | 72 | 5th May 2006 12:04 PM |
| Power regeneration questions | analog_sa | Chip Amps | 10 | 19th April 2004 07:09 PM |
| clock regeneration article on planetanalog.com | mlloyd1 | Digital Source | 3 | 12th October 2003 11:00 PM |
| Experiments with power regeneration | analog_sa | Everything Else | 3 | 26th August 2002 07:29 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11449 seconds (81.10% PHP - 18.90% MySQL) with 11 queries |