Go Back   Home > Forums > Source & Line > Analogue Source
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Analogue Source Turntables, Tonearms, Cartridges, Phono Stages, Tuners, Tape Recorders, etc.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 25th May 2008, 09:10 AM   #1
Dr. ODD is offline Dr. ODD  Germany
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Wolfsburg
Default Zobel to MC Transformers

Hi,

I am just building a fine House for my LL 1681. I am adding swichabel load resistors and I am thinking about adding swichabel Zobels (fixed resistor, swichabel Caps) too. I am wondering why Jennsen and Sowther are recommending Zobels and Lundahl does not. Are there differences in winding or something else which are mattering in this case?

I will use it 1:26 to mach a SPU Cassic A

Bernhard
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th May 2008, 12:46 PM   #2
SY is offline SY  United States
diyAudio Moderator
 
SY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Austin, TX
Blog Entries: 1
Why make it switchable?

For me, I began my MC preamp design with the transformer. I loaded it with a capacitor to simulate the Miller capacitance of the first stage, drove it with a source impedance equal to that of my particular MC, then played with various resistors and Zobels as secondary loads to get the response as flat and extended as possible.

Any transformer will benefit from this.
__________________
“There are no greater liars in the world than quacks, except for their patients.” - Benjamin Franklin
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th May 2008, 02:42 PM   #3
Dr. ODD is offline Dr. ODD  Germany
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Wolfsburg
Swichabel because

1) I have a second cartridge wich I want to use from time to time.

2) I fear that I could hurt the transformer when I solder new resistors and caps to often.

3) Your describtion looks like you measured the response. I fear this is beyond my knowlege. Do you think I can find the right values whith listening tests or do I have to learn how to measure this?

Bernhard
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th May 2008, 03:03 PM   #4
SY is offline SY  United States
diyAudio Moderator
 
SY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Austin, TX
Blog Entries: 1
I didn't measure the response directly, I used a square wave and adjusted for a compromise between HF peaking (seen as ringing on the edges) and bandwidth-limiting (seen as a sluggish rise and rounded edges).
__________________
“There are no greater liars in the world than quacks, except for their patients.” - Benjamin Franklin
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Zobel Or No Zobel ? sakis Solid State 74 2nd March 2012 09:32 AM
RCL, RL, Zobel. Juggy Multi-Way 3 14th May 2008 01:12 AM
zobel Streets97f Subwoofers 4 19th November 2006 04:44 AM
the zobel bigpanda Solid State 9 13th May 2006 03:56 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:32 AM.

Page generated in 0.07507 seconds (67.72% PHP - 32.28% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio