|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Analogue Source Turntables, Tonearms, Cartridges, Phono Stages, Tuners, Tape Recorders, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I have a lot of old cdrom players at home and i was trying to do something interesting with them, but I've been looking arround and it seems that there is really few information about laser pickups out there, well, there is a lot of information about repair and operation but little on other experiments.
My idea is to try both a laser microphone and a laser turntable, starting with the laser microphone as it seems far easier since tracking the grooves will probably be a hellish job. I would like to ask some advise with both where to get datasheets for laser pickups (I have some SF-PXXX sanyo's) and reports from people who have tried similar things. At first i will keep the laser photodiodes (once i know how to read theyr output), but probably it will end up with a photodiode better suited to linear operation. Any advise about good photodiodes for audio operation will also be helpful. I have both CDrom and DVD lasers and i don't know which ones to choose, since the ones from a dvdrom player seem easier because they are visible, they actually have a pair of laser diodes for cd and dvd operation and this makes them more complicated. Somebody has information about the coherency length of standard cdrom and dvdrom diodes? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Hi,
You have lost me. CD lasers are designed to indicate whether a pit or not exists in the disk at a particular point. They are not designed to do laser inferometry which is what you need to measure distance, either in a microphones diaphragm or the shape of a record groove. A capacitor microphone is as near perfect as it gets, why complicate it ? /sreten.
__________________
There is nothing so practical as a really good theory - Ludwig Boltzmann When your only tool is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail - Abraham Maslow |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |||
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Quote:
I feel this to be a very interesiting project but your post may help in preventing people wanting to get immediate perfect results from exposing theyr sight to a 200 mW invisible cd-burner laser (Good point to say that writing lasers should NEVER be used for experimenting). Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Quote:
I you want to do it just to do it fair enough. I cannot see that your idea will give anything like the resolution required, or in other words it will be too noisy. /sreten.
__________________
There is nothing so practical as a really good theory - Ludwig Boltzmann When your only tool is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail - Abraham Maslow |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Yes, you are right about the noise, this is only a first attempt and if i suceed i may mess into something more complicated. It seems that placing the virtual light source nearer from the photodiode will give better noise performance but worse distortion.
Do you know if the photodiodes are exposed directly to the interconnect or if they have some active circuitry built in the same die? Somebody has a datasheet for the PXR-550X? Everything on google is in asian languages and does not lead to anything downloadable. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
DANGER WILL ROBINSON!!!
The lasers from DVD and CD burners are extremely non-eyesafe. That being said, the interference microphone idea fails because a single phase wrap gives very little dynamic range. The noise level actually can be incredibly low. I don't think anyone has solved the keeping track of the phase wraps problem. I can probably get any answers on the lasers that you want. EDIT - Sorry you already said that.
__________________
2012, our time is running out. |
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
The "unfocusmeter" approach will have little problems with coherency lenght but it will be very nonlinear, but it will be the only option if considering a turntable because distances will be far higher than 700/900 nm. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
EDIT here they are http://www.elpj.com/about/index.html
__________________
2012, our time is running out. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I have seen some cheap lasers at online stores having linewidths arround 50 MHz, since i don't know the relation between linewidth and coherence lenght i'm waiting to ask at the university before buying one. Anyways, my idea is to use cd transports to move the laser and the reflecting mirror.
Somebody knows the accuracy of the pickup moving system? |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| xfmrs for microphones | hitsware | Everything Else | 1 | 8th May 2008 09:46 AM |
| Difference between microphones | Mike150 | Tubes / Valves | 1 | 19th May 2006 12:33 AM |
| Measurement microphones | ShinOBIWAN | Multi-Way | 18 | 5th January 2006 09:27 AM |
| SPL microphones? | thylantyr | Multi-Way | 3 | 18th June 2005 06:19 PM |
| Cheap microphones? | pentium | Everything Else | 0 | 30th October 2003 02:50 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.12124 seconds (80.20% PHP - 19.80% MySQL) with 10 queries |