|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Analogue Source Turntables, Tonearms, Cartridges, Phono Stages, Tuners, Tape Recorders, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#11 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Medford, MA
|
The copper cover over the "Discrete Input Stage(s)" serves two purposes:
RFI shielding and Temperature Stabilization of the PNP transistors underneath. The stage itself is simply a Red LED biased CCS (constant current source) driving a differential amplifier using two sets of three matched PNP epitaxial transistors; in tube-parlance - a long tailed pair. One side of the diff amp is grounded, the other side receives its signal from the MC or MM cartridge through a coupling capacitor. The design principle here is pretty simple: 1. Parallel together three transistors, already closely matched by the OEM to further reduce noise factor. 2. Use a CCS driving the differential amplifier to achieve very high PSRR/CMRR. There is little you could do to improve what Cambridge has done there... It's an excellent input stage for the price point. The only way to possible improve this would be to entirely gut the Discrete Stage and replace it with a similar circuit based on the Linear Systems LSK389 and cascode current source. The only advantage of resorting that that option would be to permit direct coupling from the cartridge to the JFET gate and eliminating the input capacitors and furthermore, that treatment would only really benefit someone using MC cartridges and not high-level MM that most people have. You might make marginal improvements of the tail resistors in the existing ckt... These are R54,R71 and R62, R79. You could replace these with 0.1% MF resistors. The more closely matched the tail resistors - the better the CMRR of that diff pair. -- Jim |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| cambridge audio cd-6 | chight | Digital Source | 0 | 25th November 2008 05:35 AM |
| R50 Cambridge Audio :) | PhaseLockLoopy | Multi-Way | 2 | 27th May 2008 10:37 PM |
| Cambridge Audio 640C No audio output PLEASE HELP! | Kajman | Digital Source | 3 | 10th December 2007 09:45 AM |
| CA 640P opamp advice please | ben556473 | Chip Amps | 5 | 17th November 2007 03:10 PM |
| Cambridge audio A3 i | homertooties | Solid State | 3 | 20th November 2005 03:52 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.07168 seconds (73.05% PHP - 26.95% MySQL) with 11 queries |