|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Analogue Source Turntables, Tonearms, Cartridges, Phono Stages, Tuners, Tape Recorders, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
|
Hi guys,
I found a new cartridge for my dad's old turntable. As most of his vinyl collection was sitting in a dark corner of the storage part of our basement for many years, most of the vinyl doesn't sound good enough anymore to be worth listening to. I've bought a couple new records to play on it, but I've also bought a couple used ones. He had said that he heard years ago that it wasn't good for the stylus to play used records on it, not because of dirt or debris though. I searched around and found someone saying that the used record will have a different shape groove cut into it by the old stylus. Their reasoning though was that it was the used record that would slowly get damaged by the new stylus though, as it would then have a new diamond shape groove slowly cut into it again as it reshapes to the new diamond shape. I don't mind slowly deteriorating the used $5 records, but will used records put any extra wear on a new stylus, assuming there are no obvious scratches, and I've given them a light washing and brushing? The cartridge is one that isn't made anymore, but at the same time it only has a tracking force of 1.2g, so I'm hoping it will last for some time. Thanks, Austin |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2003
|
I wouldn't worry too much. It works both ways but a new record will suffer more of a used (read worn) stylus than the other way around.
Take care of the records, take care of the stylus and enjoy the music. /Hugo |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Canandaigua, NY USA
|
I wouldn't worry about the old record theory as it's probably more of an old wives tale. I would worry about dirt. Some record cleaning techniques are better than others, with a record cleaning machine being at the top of the heap. I clean manually with an old Watts record cleaning brush and various liquids, depending on the severity of the problem, followed by a rinse and cleanup with a Diskwasher brush. There's a recipe on the 'net for cleaning fluid made of isopropyl alcohol, water and wetting agent. It works ok if the records are already in good shape, but you can do better if you're willing to rinse. For records that have been stored in really adverse conditions I use Out enzyme pet stain remover. Laugh if you want, but it's one of the best things I've tried on used records. Unless there's actual groove damage from being played on a bad system, you can usually get a pretty good playback. Also, there's nothing good about super low tracking forces. They make the system prone to mistracking, which caused more groove damage than if the record was played at a slightly higher force. I'd set the tracking force closer to the upper end of the range published for that cartridge model.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
|
Thanks guys. I have a hunt record brush that I use now for light cleaning, but since you mentioned washing, what would I use to wipe or brush the record when using the homemade water/alcohol solution?
And Conrad, I had read before than it is better to track slightly heavier, so I've been using 1.3 instead of 1.2 grams. Are you suggesting I go even heavier? I thought if the player sounds perfect with a new record at 1.3 then I should leave it at that. Austin |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Belleville, IL.
|
Quote:
__________________
Gavin |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Germany
|
Don't trash your old records! Even heavily abused ones can sound ok (or even suberb), when played with a needle that is sharper as the ones before, so the groove can digged out deeper where not so much damage took place. ´Same logic applies it you try a round needle on 'deeply' damaged records. Thorough cleaning is mandatory, of course.
I would take care for heavy scratches, of course. Rüidger
__________________
"I can feel what's going on inside a piece of electronic equipment. I have a sense that I know what's going on inside the transistors." Robert Moog |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: near london
|
Hi Camshaft
I have a lot of old records as I have been collecting them for over 50 years. As with Conrad, I clean them with a mixture of distilled water, isopropyl alcohol and a wetting agent ( one small drop of washing up liquid ). I apply that with a velvet brush and then rinse in distilled water. Really dirty records will come clean if you keep washing. Some of my records were flooded one time but repeated washing got them clean. I have tried various disk cleaning machines and found them about the same as cleaning with a velvet brush. Don |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Near London. UK
|
I've seen a turntable manufacturer demonstrating how good their turntable was at a Hi-Fi show by deliberately only playing second-hand records from charity shops. Subliminal thought, "If it sounds this good with records of dubious provenance, what will it sound like with mine?" The cartridge was a Koetsu.
Dirty records damage styli, not worn grooves.
__________________
The loudspeaker: The only commercial Hi-Fi item where a disproportionate part of the budget isn't spent on the box. And the one where it would make a difference... |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Germany
|
Hi EC....,
I suppose that deep scratches that cause heavy pops will very likely damage [edit] needles... Rüdiger
__________________
"I can feel what's going on inside a piece of electronic equipment. I have a sense that I know what's going on inside the transistors." Robert Moog |
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Near London. UK
|
Quote:
__________________
The loudspeaker: The only commercial Hi-Fi item where a disproportionate part of the budget isn't spent on the box. And the one where it would make a difference... |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| This isn't damaging my system is it? | Prismatic | Subwoofers | 5 | 3rd July 2006 08:34 AM |
| GC damaging speakers? | drfrink24 | Chip Amps | 33 | 6th April 2005 04:32 PM |
| LP Records | David Huang | Analogue Source | 2 | 7th June 2001 05:14 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10647 seconds (80.93% PHP - 19.07% MySQL) with 10 queries |