|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Analogue Source Turntables, Tonearms, Cartridges, Phono Stages, Tuners, Tape Recorders, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
|
I've always wanted a proper tape delay for use with the guitar. The digital units are fine but the ones I can afford are not even close to competing with an actual tape delay.
Basically, what I'm thinking is taking two of those hand-held tape recorders and installing them in a box with a tape going in a loop. The signal goes into the first unit that records it to the tape. The second would have multiple tape heads placed right after the writing head, distance between the reading heads being equal to the distance between the writing head and the first reading head. There would obviously be a variable feedback going from the second tape recorder output to the input of the first one. The "extra" read heads would probably need off switches for feedback trickery. A variable speed shouldn't be too hard to achieve with a floppy drive motor. I've tried a few and there's more than enough torque in them. Now, the actual question. Would it be possible to use a tape head from one of those car cassette adapters as a reading head? After some twenty minutes of reading about tape and how it works, I've come to the conclusion that it should work. I've ordered a few $1 units from eBay. Maybe they'll actually work. I've got a few schematics for tape head amplifiers here. Slightly more complicated than what I'm used to but I'll give them a shot when I have time. Any ideas? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Shropshire, England
|
Most cheap cassette heads are universal rec / play, and I doubt that those used in the car adapters are specially made for the job - they may be sub-spec examples though.
I'd suggest, however, that you consider 1/4 inch tape for this project rather than the fragile and difficult to handle 1/8 in cassete tape. A reliable transport would then be a much easier proposition. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
|
I actually have some 1/4" tapes/reels and a Grundig TK-141 reel-to-reel player. I did think about basing the delay system on the Grundig but alas, it only has two heads. One for playing/recording and one for erasing. Even if I had a three-head unit, it would be very bulky and would likely have too many unnecessary parts.
Actually, now that I think about it. If I machined a new roller/alignment system, would it be possible to use 1/4" tape with 1/8" heads? Sure, there would be lots of wasted tape space but it would work, right? The mechanical side wouldn't be a problem, considering I have a fairly precise miniature lathe and a mill at my disposal. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Vancouver, BC
|
what about starting with an old vcr? (or two) I remember a friend had an 8 track recorded that used vhs tape once. Big solid tape and still has the ease of a cassette maybe.
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Calgary, Alberta
|
IMHO: STOP right now and buy yourself a PT2399 chip on eBay to make your delay. So much simpler, cheaper, and so much more likely to wind up with a reliable end product.
__________________
Aerodynamics are for people who can't build engines. Enzo Ferrari |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Shropshire, England
|
Using1/4" tape with cassette heads is really a non-starter. Apart from the drawbacks - poor head contact, uneven stretch and weave, high noise etc., any saving will be offset by the time and troubel involved in engineering a reliable transport.
The VHS idea is a good one, though - machines (and tapes) are free these days, there's room to fit a number of audio heads - especially if the head drum is removed -, and the capstan servo could be modified for variable speed quite easily. Solid state is certainly easier, but I can understand why you want to go with tape. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Mexico, at present.
|
Outside of the digital domain, does any design exist that emulates tape delay sound using solid state circuitry...what kind of analog processing would give the closest results sound wise, some kind of VC pitch shifting cicuit and some chorus or phaser type effect?
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Vancouver, BC
|
If I remember right there was an era of analog delay pedals that used a bucket brigade chip. I don't know if those are available anymore, it was so close to being a digital sampling circuit they've probably all gone that way.
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
|
Right then. I now have the heads, parts for a capstan drive and tape (VHS).
Am I correct in thinking that the erase head is basically just an output head with a strong 40khz signal "blanking" the tape? Will square-wave do? Would a simple Little Gem (http://runoffgroove.com/littlegem.html) amplifier work for powering the record/play/erase heads? Also, let's say I was to ignore biasing completely. How terrible would it sound? |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Nijmegen!
|
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Tube tape NR | mashaffer | Tubes / Valves | 0 | 26th October 2008 07:48 PM |
| Tape Tests | percy | Analogue Source | 15 | 17th August 2008 10:23 PM |
| EE tape reels | coloradosound | Analogue Source | 2 | 15th March 2008 01:01 AM |
| cassette tape echo / delay | thegunshyboy | Instruments and Amps | 10 | 23rd November 2006 11:36 PM |
| MP3 To TAPE ? | vahid | Analogue Source | 0 | 19th March 2004 12:33 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.12934 seconds (83.22% PHP - 16.78% MySQL) with 10 queries |