Go Back   Home > Forums > Source & Line > Analogue Source
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Analogue Source Turntables, Tonearms, Cartridges, Phono Stages, Tuners, Tape Recorders, etc.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 6th January 2008, 07:01 PM   #51
diyAudio Member
 
Onvinyl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Germany
Quote:
Originally posted by scott wurcer

In full disclosure, I personally use a zero feedback phono stage using the really unobtanium Toshiba matched pairs with the huge tophat metal case. I got them at Akihabara 20yr. ago.
I'm in the process to build/design a zero feedback phono stage with the latest unobtaniums 389/109.
Are you talking about the 2sk146/2sj73 ?

And talking about 'full disclosure', are you using 2 or 3 gain blocks?
More infos would be nice, eg. bandwith, first stage gain, noise, ...

Rüdiger
__________________
"I can feel what's going on inside a piece of electronic equipment. I have a sense that I know what's going on inside the transistors." Robert Moog
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th January 2008, 10:32 PM   #52
diyAudio Member
 
scott wurcer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: cambridge ma
Quote:
Originally posted by Onvinyl


I'm in the process to build/design a zero feedback phono stage with the latest unobtaniums 389/109.
Are you talking about the 2sk146/2sj73 ?

And talking about 'full disclosure', are you using 2 or 3 gain blocks?
More infos would be nice, eg. bandwith, first stage gain, noise, ...

Rüdiger
That's right on the devices. It's been mothballed for a couple of years, but as I remember it was a gain stage with the high frequency pole followed by a stage with the rest of the RIAA time constants. It went into a Jung 823/815 line stage that Walt was kind enough to give me, everything on Walt's super regulator. I built the thing in a flurry of activity and then lost the schematics.
__________________
2012, our time is running out.
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th January 2008, 11:10 PM   #53
diyAudio Member
 
Onvinyl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Germany
Quote:
Originally posted by scott wurcer


It went into a Jung 823/815 line stage that Walt was kind enough to give me, everything on Walt's super regulator. I built the thing in a flurry of activity and then lost the schematics.
Hehe, so I'm not the only one who can't remember what the heck he did on that board the week before...
Anyway, it's cool to know that it is possible to build an open-loop phonostage.

Rüdiger
__________________
"I can feel what's going on inside a piece of electronic equipment. I have a sense that I know what's going on inside the transistors." Robert Moog
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th January 2008, 08:49 AM   #54
diyAudio Member
 
PigletsDad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South Worcestershire
Default A hitch - cannot disclose Maclaren circuit

Sorry, guys. I looked out my Maclaren stuff, and found my letter of engagement, where I agreed not to disclose the circuit, nor to build it commercially myself. Now the NZ company (Zetka Enterprises) that made the Maclaren stuff stopped trading in the early 90s, but I think I am still bound by my original undertaking.

Of course, the agreement doesn't stop me disclosing some other circuit, which is different to the Maclaren design, but maybe shares some general features with it.

So I will do a new design just for diyaudio. The general topology is as follows:

Two stage design:

All bipolar transistor. For the MC input stage, uses Renesas 2sa1085 and 2sc2547. The rest are BC550 and BC560. Complementary symmetry circuits.

First stage captures the noise figure, and raises the levels to the point that noise in the second stage is not an issue, but overload is also unlikely. The first stage is non-inverting, and has a flat frequency response (give or take any RF rolloff you elect to go for). I will give instructions for how to tailor the values to match different classes of cartridge. This stage is entirely DC coupled. 6 transistors/channel.

The second stage provides the rest of the gain and the RIAA equalization. This is an inverting stage. The HF rolloff is passive, and forms part of the input network. I prefer to stick with the actual RIAA curve, but if you want to add a zero at 50kHz to match the Neumann cutting head, it needs 1 extra resistor. The two low frequency time constants form the feedback network. 6 transistors/channel. There is a coupling capacitor between first and second stages, which sets the LF rolloff.
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th January 2008, 11:44 AM   #55
diyAudio Member
 
PigletsDad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South Worcestershire
First stage.

There are obvious things that could be changed to improve the circuit in various ways, but they also make it more complex.

The PSRR is limited in this version, so the +/-12V supply must be fairly low noise.

Values shown are for low impedance MC cartridges of typical output (say 300 to 700uV). If you have a very low output one like some Ortofons, increase R4.

RF problems vary widely, and the value of C3 that you want or need may be very different to that shown.

Second stage will follow once I draw it up.
Attached Images
File Type: png crophead.png (12.4 KB, 1507 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th January 2008, 01:49 PM   #56
diyAudio Member
 
PigletsDad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South Worcestershire
The equalisation stage.

The components with EQ in the name (like CEQ1 etc.) are involved in setting the RIAA equalization, and should be close tolerance - 1% resistors, 5% or better capacitors.

The signal levels are higher, so the PSU requirements for this stage are not so fussy. Note that this runs on +/- 24V. If you are happy to do without 6dB of headroom, you could use +/- 12V. In that case change the current setting resistors for the input pairs from 47K to 24K, to keep the operating current the same.
Attached Images
File Type: png cropeq.png (11.0 KB, 1338 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th January 2008, 03:24 PM   #57
h_a is offline h_a  Europe
diyAudio Member
 
h_a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Graz, Austria
Very interesting design!!

Still need to think more about it.

By the way, CEQ2 appears twice in the equalisation stage; I guess only the 3n3 cap is the real CEQ2?

Do you plan to build this circuit? I would be very interested in its performance.

All the best, Hannes
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th January 2008, 04:13 PM   #58
diyAudio Member
 
PigletsDad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South Worcestershire
Hannes,

Thanks for spotting that. Here is the correctly labelled version.

I built the first version of a design like this back in 1982. The Maclaren version was sold between 1985 and about 1989 (I think), and replaced by a design by their in-house engineer.

Measured performance was pretty good. Noise is low - about 0.7nV/rt Hz. Distortion is very low. Overload margin is very good. EQ accuracy is spot on (better than 0.2dB) if you get accurate components, with just a little in band bass loss from the choice of 16Hz for the LF -3dB point.

The design has no electrolytic caps in the signal path, only film, and the crucial input stage is all DC coupled. I won't comment on the subjective performance, as I am a biased observer, but still use the production version.
Attached Images
File Type: png cropeq.png (10.6 KB, 1270 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th January 2008, 04:48 PM   #59
Electrons are yellow and more is better!
diyAudio Member
 
peranders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Göteborg, Sweden
Blog Entries: 4
Quote:
Originally posted by PigletsDad
The design has no electrolytic caps in the signal path, only film, and the crucial input stage is all DC coupled. I won't comment on the subjective performance, as I am a biased observer, but still use the production version.
If you ever build this amp you will probably be aware of your offset problems => huge

AC coupled or DC servos are musts.
__________________
/Per-Anders (my first name) or P-A as my friends call me
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th January 2008, 05:11 PM   #60
diyAudio Member
 
PigletsDad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South Worcestershire
Peranders,

It is AC coupled, just with film caps. The impedance scales have been chosen so that film values are practical.

I absolutely agree that a DC coupled phono preamp would be a disaster.

In fact, one reason for the two stage design is to keep the gain in each individual design down to a level where the DC offset is bearable. The first block has DC gain of 100 - 40dB. Assuming the input transistors are matched to a few mV (which is reasonable in practice), the offset at the output of the first block is maybe half a volt or so. The second section is AC coupled at input and output. The main driver of offset is the input bias current (about 0.5uA) in the feedback resistor (1M). Again the output offset is of order 0.5V.

In this design you must not remove the coupling cap between the two blocks.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Where can I get a pcb for a discrete GC preamp? raypalmer Chip Amps 2 27th January 2009 10:45 AM
which discrete preamp ? sopapo Solid State 12 13th January 2006 08:11 PM
Pre-pre; phono; pre line ;device discrete (bjt/fet) o op. amplifier GIPIONE Solid State 8 18th December 2005 09:09 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:31 PM.

Page generated in 0.12482 seconds (81.88% PHP - 18.12% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio