|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Analogue Source Turntables, Tonearms, Cartridges, Phono Stages, Tuners, Tape Recorders, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Germany
|
Hi,
what are the requirements to drive a riaa network properly? I have the feeling that C2/R11 are not driven properly, but how can I make sure what's approriate? The question is both technically (the amount of current, voltage swing and so on) and sonically (what does sound good according to your experience) Yes, there are only the lower two time constants in my example. Rüdiger
__________________
"I can feel what's going on inside a piece of electronic equipment. I have a sense that I know what's going on inside the transistors." Robert Moog |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Germany
|
To narrow my question: if I have to take into account this formula:
Ic = C*(dV/dt) then, at a frequency of 20kHz and a voltage swing at the output of 4V, with the shown cap of 1.1µF, I'd need a current of around 88mA, so my output stage is way too shy. Is this reasoning correct? Rüdiger
__________________
"I can feel what's going on inside a piece of electronic equipment. I have a sense that I know what's going on inside the transistors." Robert Moog |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South Worcestershire
|
Yes, which is why you would not want to do it this way.
Your circuit has a high output impedance, and as I understand it, the effective gain depends on the load impedance. But this is nasty property, as it means the frequency response will depend heavily on loading by subsequent stages. If you did want to stick with your approach, you are going to have to raise the impedance a lot - for example, you could raise R4 and R11 by a factor of 10, and cut C2 by the same factor. You also face a fundamental difficulty, in that when you add the third time constant (presumably by adding a capacitor across R11), the maximum output swing will drop proportionally to frequency - or equivalently, the input overload level becomes frequency independent. This may or may not be a problem - I seem to remember that maximum trackable velocities tend to fall with frequency above say 5 or 8kHz. So if you have enough overload margin to handle say 100cm/s at the stylus (more than anything ever made can track), you might be OK. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Germany
|
Hi,
the missing tc is tackled in a prior gain stage. Rüdiger
__________________
"I can feel what's going on inside a piece of electronic equipment. I have a sense that I know what's going on inside the transistors." Robert Moog |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Please help with the designing of a passive crossover network! | Big_Bill | Multi-Way | 74 | 17th July 2009 05:53 AM |
| mix current drive with voltage drive at LF? | capslock | Multi-Way | 0 | 27th April 2006 11:17 AM |
| Designing a Phonostage with the S&B 10K LCR RIAA Module | ThorstenL | Tubes / Valves | 26 | 21st February 2005 01:38 PM |
| How to determine optimal bias class A current? | Sunsun22 | Chip Amps | 2 | 30th August 2004 10:49 AM |
| caps for RIAA network | GAK | Tubes / Valves | 2 | 9th February 2004 12:05 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08915 seconds (80.95% PHP - 19.05% MySQL) with 11 queries |