|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Analog Line Level Preamplifiers , Passive Pre-amps, Crossovers, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Hi all!
I'm thinking of using balanced connections from my cartridge (a MM) to the phonostage and converting the signal there to unbalanced (since that is what is used internally). Is it correct that I gain with balanced wiring +6dB voltage from the cartridge? That would mean double voltage?! But how's that possible? That would mean that the - signal is also used (instead of being connected to ground), ok then I should have +6dB. On the other hand the secondary of the transformer is again grounded and I do get the full voltage - so this should be true also for the cartridge which would mean that there is no double voltage then. Please help me out of this! Thanks a lot!! With kind regards, Hannes |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sacramento, CA
|
There would be no voltage gain, assuming you're using a 1:1 transformer.
The reason people have this notion of balanced somehow inherently meaning a 6dB voltage gain is because often what's done to create a balanced output is to send a single-ended signal to two amplifiers, one non-inverting and one inverting. That will give you 6dB of voltage gain over the single-ended output. When using a 1:1 transformer to do balanced to unbalanced or unbalanced to balanced conversion, the voltage out is equal to the voltage in. Ideally anyway. There will be some amount of insertion loss with any realworld 1:1 transformer, but that's beside the point. se |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
|
I'm as big a transformer fan as they get. But I would never use transformers is this case. Whatever pros there may be, I can't see them outweight the cons.
|
|
|
|
#4 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sacramento, CA
|
Quote:
Quote:
An input transformer at the phono stage would be helpful for providing a good deal of common-mode noise rejection, but it would make cartridge loading a bit problematic. se |
||
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Guys you got me wrong.
I want to use the balanced output from the cartridge to the phonoamp and convert it then to unbalanced! That's the point the trafo comes in. However I do understand now that there's no voltage gain, in contrast to what I was repeatedly told by some manufacturer. Indeed Steve Eddy - thanks!! - explained what the manufacturer seems not to be able to!! What about cartridge loading? I just need to add the capacitors (MM needs them) on the primary side, from + to ground and also from - to ground, right? Since this would be a 1:1 trafo, the 47k on the secondary side will also appear on the primary - right? Thanks for all your help!! With kind regards, Hannes |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Northern Va.
|
The phono cartridge is not necessarily balanced. While it may start off that way, one side of the coil may be connected to ground in the headshell.
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
|
Lets say you add 50k:50k input transformers on the phono stage and add XLRs.
Still there would be little to gain. And if you go this distance you can just as well get a step-up transformer insted of the 50k:50k one and a MC cart. |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
@phn: MC is not generally better, although highend-people believe so.
What do you mean with 50k:50k? Trafo-impedance? I usually see values like 600Ohm for MCs or mics and 10k for line input? @pooge: yes you're perfectly right! In most cartridges at least 1 channel is balanced, the other - regardless wether it's MM, MC or something else - is usually connected to the cartridge's case. However even then the balanced solution should work, since the trafo sees double height + & GND instead of + & -?? Or I can isolate the cartridge from the tonearm, so there would be no connection to ground then. Of course the case is then electrically active and no longer grounded...do you think this would cause problems? Thanks for your replies!! With kind regards, Hannes |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
Hi,
some cartridges have a removable shorting link from one pin to the case/arm.
__________________
regards Andrew T. |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Which ones? Could you name some brands?
I want to use a Shure and a Nagaoka cartridge. At least the Shure has a visible link from one pin to its case but it doesn't look removable. The Nagaoka hints about internal grounding in its operating manual. Do you think I would run into problems isolating the cartridge from the arm? It would become electronically active and would be no longer grounded. What do you think? Cheers, Hannes |
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Unbalanced to balanced input conversion? | SQLGuy | Solid State | 53 | 19th October 2009 01:39 AM |
| unbalanced to balanced conversion | neazoi | Chip Amps | 4 | 5th August 2008 12:45 PM |
| Line input transformer for unbalanced to balanced conversion | okapi | Chip Amps | 23 | 12th January 2008 05:29 PM |
| Balanced to Unbalanced w/ Transformer? | lgreen | Solid State | 9 | 6th January 2004 04:37 AM |
| unbalanced/balanced/unbalanced conversion using transformers | vladimir | Solid State | 10 | 27th February 2003 06:54 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.13502 seconds (72.00% PHP - 28.00% MySQL) with 10 queries |