|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Analog Line Level Preamplifiers , Passive Pre-amps, Crossovers, etc. |
|
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Dears, is the above a tactic to reduce preamp gain? Or nothing related to this? preamp is a noval aikido with 6n1p input and 6n6p output tubes.
Checked replacement of the input tubes to reduce gain, but theory says it will not be enough. I am near to pad input volume with resistors but a pot replacement might be a simpler choice? Thanx for response, please basic style as i am extremely basic. Thanxs |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
Changing the pot shouldn't alter the gain at all. As you mention valves though, its possible the lower value would load whatever stage drives it... which is something you don't want.
The best way to lower the gain may be just a simple attenuator at the input. Altering gain by altering the feedback internally in the amp may cause other problems and require other alterations.
__________________
------------------------------------------------------- A simulation free zone. Design it, build it, test it. |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
If I dont have space inside the preamp, can I go from source (phono stage in my case) to a passive stepped attenuator preamp?Its output would then go to the high gain preamp. Is this too crazy or possible without compromising signal?
Thanx |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
Certainly its possible and could work well in practice.
Its just that amplifying a signal (the phono stage) and then attenuating the signal only to amplify it again is never the best solution from a purist view. Each stage of gain adds noise and distortion.
__________________
------------------------------------------------------- A simulation free zone. Design it, build it, test it. |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Thanxs Mooly, appreciated your courtesy. So maybe it would be better and more purist If really take a solder gun to decrease 10dB from pre input with two resistors.
I wanted to avoid but in fact it makes sense? Cheers |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Replacing 50K pot with 10K pot | KevinLee | Parts | 10 | 10th December 2007 03:50 AM |
| looking for a dual pot, with concentric shaft with values of 100K and 50K | jealousblues | Parts | 4 | 21st July 2006 06:02 PM |
| Effect of using 50k pot instead of 100k pot in tube preamp? | KT | Tubes / Valves | 5 | 17th February 2006 09:56 PM |
| 50K vs 100K POT | ss1 | Parts | 7 | 22nd July 2004 12:57 PM |
| 50K or 100K pot? | 2Bak | Chip Amps | 14 | 9th November 2003 02:25 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |