|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Analog Line Level Preamplifiers , Passive Pre-amps, Crossovers, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Bristol
|
Hi there,
Think this is the right part of forum (sorry if not)... I was hoping someone might be able to help with this problem: I have built a preamp for piezo pick-up which is working except that there is a noticeable delay between input and output. From researching this, I think this is because of phase/group delay, but wondered if anyone else has had this problem. Also getting mains hum - was wondering about connecting ground from sensor to a shielded enclosure, but this preamp is 9V battery operated, so how would grounding/earthing it work? And would you connect the negative nail to the enclosure as well..? Thanks in advance. |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
|
Delay?
If you would post your circuit... |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Midland, Michigan
|
The low side of the input (or the output) should be connected to the metal enclosure.
__________________
Frank |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Bristol
|
mickey - sorry - forgot to add the circuit. Please see attachment. The only difference between the schematic and the build is that the gain stage after the buffer is now a lot lower, somewhere around x10. I was planning to re-designing this stage so that it is an active volume control and ditching the end passive vol control. It will remain an inverting stage though. May well be reducing gain in the tone control as well in future builds. Turns out piezo signal is stronger than I originally thought!
Frank - thanks for that - so either connect the low sides (I assume that's the ground connections?) of the input OR the output to the metal case - not both? And it sounds like not a good idea to connect the negative rail to the metal case either? Should the low side be only connected to the case and thus not also connected to the negative rail? Sorry for being pedantic, just trying to get my head around this. I've read quite a lot online about grounding and it still confuses me... Thanks for your help guys. Si |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
When you say "noticeable delay," what are we talking about? Microseconds? Milliseconds? And measured how?
__________________
If there's a sucker born every minute, where do the rest of them come from? |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
|
Hi Epic
May i suggest changing C3 to 100uF , 100nF is OK decoupling for the input of U1 but will give a high impedance ground for U2 and U5.......this may help with your hum situation . |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Bristol
|
SY - I haven't been able to measure it with any testing gear. My term "noticeable delay" is based on attaching the piezo disk to an acoustic guitar and playing a string. There is an audible delay between the string being played (with the accompanying acoustic sound from the guitar itself) and the output from the speakers. It's enough to put you off if you were playing live, for example.
For clarity, the piezo is plugged into the preamp, which is plugged into an M-audio interface which connects to a Macbook. epicyclic - thanks for the recommendation re. decoupling cap - will try this out. Cheers |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2007
|
Software processing time. Welcome to digital audio!
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Bristol
|
DF96 - software processing time was the problem. Just tried it with a normal guitar amp and works with no time delay. Don't know why I didn't do that in the first place - stupid!
Incidentally, the hum is seriously reduced when through the guitar amp. Is there any way around the whole software processing time delay problem when connecting to an audio interface? |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2007
|
Use a much much faster machine or much much faster software.
or Don't use digital - there will always be a delay, so the best you can do is minimise it. |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| help: preamp hum | monsieur2 | Solid State | 9 | 15th May 2009 03:28 PM |
| The Look of Preamp Hum | tgorham3 | Tubes / Valves | 1 | 22nd March 2008 04:22 PM |
| Preamp output delay | derekyu | Tubes / Valves | 4 | 28th June 2006 05:49 PM |
| Preamp hum. | mschwilson | Solid State | 1 | 2nd April 2006 07:07 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |