|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Analog Line Level Preamplifiers , Passive Pre-amps, Crossovers, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#201 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#202 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Zagreb
|
I will try to explain why I think it was not good idea at least for my shunt regulator.
1. I whant to regulate both sides + and - with one trimer for that. 2. I tried not to uze zener diode as reference(used in Borbely simple shunt reg) as that defeat poit 1.(and it is noisier). 3. Output impedance is low enough, a wires could input higher impedance. 4. To spare a diodes is not so important as above points. dado |
|
|
|
#203 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Zagreb
|
Quote:
I have a bunch of different small jfets and only TO220 supertex type, and they are noisier as bcarso pointed out. Cascoding of the ccs, I think, is not very needed. dado |
|
|
|
|
#204 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I was afraid of that. anyway I will buy some to experiment.
__________________
Sérgio Santos |
|
|
|
#206 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Walt's recommendation was the reason I tried them and tested them in fact. They are not too bad, but there is no guarantee, no specification for noise, and it is highly process-dependent. But those Supertex parts I tried were not as bad as I feared and would be quite adequate for many situations (like plate loads for hybrid tube circuits, which was my application at the time).
Brad |
|
|
|
#207 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
You're right Dadod, I didn't think about how the zener would act as a reference. I'm a total go for the regulator as it is, FWIW. Keep up the good work.
|
|
|
|
#208 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Zagreb
|
|
|
|
|
#209 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Zagreb
|
Discussion, in an other thread, about the need to have SUPER HIGH bandwidth was the reason to do some FFT simulation at 20kHz, 100kHz and 1MHz.
Here are the simulations only, I hope that the real result will be not far from it. dado |
|
|
|
#210 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Denmark
|
Sergio.. would it be possible to make something like the circuit in post #180 with balanced in..??
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| The InSense Current Conveyor | bcarso | Digital Source | 17 | 20th August 2012 09:11 AM |
| An inverting current conveyor approach | bcarso | Digital Source | 0 | 30th July 2012 06:12 PM |
| High voltage, low current output stage for class D amplifier | ionomolo | Class D | 45 | 15th February 2011 06:03 PM |
| voltage vs current | Raj1 | Solid State | 1 | 12th June 2004 05:35 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |