|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Analog Line Level Preamplifiers , Passive Pre-amps, Crossovers, etc. |
|
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: PA
|
I have a preamplifier design (tube) in which I would like to reduce L-R channel crosstalk (ie. I would like to improve channel separation).
The space requirements and layout had me running unshielded left and right conductors very near each other, with input wires running down the right side of the chassis, and output wires running up the left side (tube gain stages are up front). Measured channel separation was poor as a result. I want to use the same wiring paths, but if I separate the wiring into L/R paths I will be forced to run the input and output wires close to each other. Capacitive coupling at higher frequencies would theoretically cause some form of high frequency global feedback, I think. What issues might arise? Thanks for any tips!
__________________
"Where is my mind? Where is my mind? Wheeere is myyy mind? Waaay out, in the water, see it swimmin'..." Black Francis |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
Interesting question. Shielded cable should be pretty immune to being near the output wiring.
One often overlooked problem is that of unequal crosstalk between channels which can cause image imbalance. That really is something to try and get right but you need to be able to do measurements to see what is actually happening. Crosstalk per se isn't necessarily a problem. Remember vinyl is only around 20 to 30db and I would imagine most amps improve on that by orders of magnitude.
__________________
------------------------------------------------------- A simulation free zone. Design it, build it, test it. |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2007
|
L/R crosstalk is a lot less harmful than in/out crosstalk!
Use screened cable for the input, or twisted pairs with a bit of distance between them. Forgot to mention: if the output impedance of the source is sufficiently low then capacitive L/R crosstalk will be small anyway. Could the crosstalk actually be coming from grounding rather than stray capacitance? Last edited by DF96; 29th September 2012 at 09:27 AM. Reason: mention source impedance etc. |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Chatham, England
|
Surely the easiest thing to do is just replace the unscreened wire with screened?
__________________
Al I conceive of nothing, in religion, science or philosophy, that is more than the proper thing to wear, for a while. Charles Fort |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
I find that cross channel talk to be a bigger problem.
It's when a selected source goes very quiet and a non selected source interferes with the wanted sound. |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: PA
|
Thanks for the tips so far, everyone. I am aware that there are workarounds like using shielded wire, etc.
But, like many of us here, I am on a quest for knowledge! I really got curious about the effects of capacitive coupling between input and output leads and want to find out more about the possible results. It seems like adding a frequency-dependent feedback loop to the system, low in level to be sure but rising with freq...?
__________________
"Where is my mind? Where is my mind? Wheeere is myyy mind? Waaay out, in the water, see it swimmin'..." Black Francis |
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Coffs Harbour, on the east coast
|
Quote:
The strength of boost or cut depends on phase difference too but you won't get a lot of useful benefit without properly designed circuits. Did you have something else in mind?
__________________
regards |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2007
|
In/out capacitive coupling is likely to lead to treble lift or cut, perhaps combined with ringing or oscillation. Best avoided, unless wanted and therefore designed in.
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Input volume pot wiring | kacernator | Tubes / Valves | 12 | 4th August 2011 08:52 PM |
| Wiring of input transformer | EspenE | Solid State | 1 | 27th April 2011 08:42 AM |
| Bipolar output stage prefers capacitive or inductive load? | Paul W | Solid State | 14 | 7th October 2006 02:44 PM |
| XLR Audio Input Wiring | haldor | Parts | 0 | 5th February 2003 02:59 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |