![]() |
Modifying Maplin preamp kit
I should start by saying that I have a very basic knowledge of electronics, and that this is the first electronics project I have worked on; I also have a very limited budget.
My brother has a pair of active monitors (Alesis M1Active MKII), and multiple input sources. He would like to be able to switch between sources, and control their volume, without unplugging and and fiddling around with the monitors. I initially thought that it would be okay to simply wire inputs through a double pole rotary switch, and then through a dual potentiometer, however on further reading it looked like this would cause problems with impedance matching. The monitors have an input impedance of only 20 kΩ, and runs of cable of up to 5 meters might be used between the passive pre'amp' and the monitors. In order to rectify this it looks like I should use a unity gain buffer amplifier, so that the monitors see a low output impedance from the preamp. What I hope to be able to do is modify this preamp kit from Maplin so that the gain is lowered to unity, Low-Noise Stereo Preamp Kit : TR Kits : Maplin Electronics and schematic, http://www.maplin.co.uk/media/pdfs/N47FL.pdf I would like to use the kit as it is cheap, readily available to me, comes with a PCB, and according to the specs should run off of a 5V power supply which I can get very cheaply from a wall USB charger, however with my limited knowledge this might not be an appropriate solution. So, what I want:
What I don't understand:
If my solution sounds unfeasible, unnecessarily difficult, or just plain stupid, can you suggest a better method? Thank you for taking the time to read this, I would greatly appreciate if someone could help me out a bit. |
A virtual ground is created by R3/R4 (R7/R8), creating an offset voltage on the outputs of the IC equal to the ratio of these resistors
Placing the gain control after the amp reduces the signal and the noise of the amp If R1=R2 gain would be 1 The problem with this circuit is that it inverts the signal (not desirable), the resistors, to reduce noise, should be metal film, not carbon film. The supply voltage should be much higher than 5V to give you some headrooom E |
Mockymoose, thanks for your information. I can get metal film resistors for 26p each (0.42 Canadian dollars) to replace those which come with the kit, and I found a 12V power supply which is currently unused. If the only implication of the inverting amplifier is that the output signal will be 180 degrees out of phase than that is acceptable to me.
Would it be better to short R1 & R2, or choose some value of resistor to use for them? Does this choice affect the input impedance and power requirements of the circuit? |
26p for a resistor seems a bit steep unless they are 1%. Go for the 5% MF types.
R2:R1 give you the gain of the amp, here 100 (40dB). To allow for a useable range for the adjustment of the pot you should have some gain. Maybee 2k2 Ohm for a linear pot and 10k for a log pot to give you 0dB at midpoint pot setting Good luck. E |
A volume control on the output of an op-amp does not make any sense!
|
Quote:
Maybe it's supposed to be a microphone preamp or something.
The volume control potentiometers are in the wrong place electrically and mechanically, so it would be best to leave them out and just use this as a unity gain buffer after a passive preamp. It won't work with a 5V supply. They claim it works with a supply of 3V to 25V, but it doesn't. It uses a 5532 chip which needs at least 10V, preferably more. (+-15V is normal). There must be better preamp kits out there. |
Thank you godfrey,
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
R1 sets the input impedance, so I would recommend at least 10K, probably more. Bear in mind the low frequency rolloff is determined by R1 and C1. With 10K and 1uF, the bass will roll off below about 16Hz (ignoring the volume control pot). Doubling R1 to 22K will get you down to 8Hz. I'd probably use a 10K volume control pot and set R1 = R2 = 22K. Maybe others will chip in with their opinions. btw, I'd recommend using 1% metal film resistors - they're cheap enough. You'll probably have to buy a packet of 10 (another good reason to use all the same value), so you'll have some leftovers. It might be a good idea to use a couple of those to replace the pots that came with the Kit. Here's a pic so we can see what we're talking about. I've filled in the original values that came with the kit. [OT] What was anybody thinking when they designed this? As supplied, the frequency response rolls off below about 160Hz. :no: [/OT] |
Re: supply voltages for a 5532, I'd have to disagree. I have a little Btech BT928 headphone amp using one (the Philips variety, I think), and that seems quite happy amplifying at 4.5 volts, though obviously maximum output amplitude is quite modest. 3 volts gets kinda noisy and distorted, so that's too little.
10k pot and R1 = R2 = 22k (MF) seems about right. With the given values of R3/R4, C4 should be more like 220n (film). When reducing them to 47k/47k for better DC balance, increase to 470n. |
IMHO, if hum is a problem and C4 is to be increased, you may as well go all the way and use e.g. 10uF electrolytic. Doubling it to 220nF would only give a 6dB improvement.
|
| All times are GMT. The time now is 07:55 AM. |
vBulletin Optimisation provided by
vB Optimise (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2013 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2013 diyAudio