|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Analog Line Level Preamplifiers , Passive Pre-amps, Crossovers, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#21 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
did I say that ?
I just thought it was ok to ask but when you are experienced with speaker design, then I dont understand why you focus on precise matching of the electronic side only ![]() its been a while since speaker design have moved beyond that or do people still think the active design is so superiour that they are 'in the clear' |
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
Quote:
am I reading you correctly here
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
I usually make it clear in my posts between guessing and my opinion and facts and regurgitating other's observations.
If you look up Linkwitz you will find just about every EQ and crossover arrangement you could ever require. Note particularly the difference between crossover and driver EQ. The driver EQ must be designed and implemented for that driver. Nothing else outside that matters. Move the crossover frequency and the driver EQ stays the same. Does that sound like I know nothing? If it does then, as I suggested earlier, sort the wheat from the chaff Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
ah, Linkwitz, yeah, ok
driver EQ ? you mean woofer bass EQ ? well, thats not even being considered yet making my job even more difficult ? yeah, surely, and why not if I wanted it easy, I wouldnt be here at all btw, Linkwitz is making fixed custiomised crossovers, by caculations and measurements, and not variable ones, right ? I could choose to do that, but will focus on a variable filter besides, the way linkwitz does it looks a bit different from what I see elsewhere different solutions to the same thing, or ? but Im not arguing which way is good or better, not at all and as said, maybe it doesnt get any further than this if its all about reading Linkwitz, and anything else just guessing, then it surely wont if you are interested, its good and if not, thats fine too its not something I desperately need to do I just thought it might interest others too |
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
about speaker design ?
if thats all, Im sorry to say yes its bettert than nothing, but not really much either Im sure you could tell me how the active filter works, in every detail and it would all be of very high value to me but without the understanding of how the speaker functions, it wont really be the info I need then I could just as well buy a plug and play thing |
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Bandung
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
yes, ESP project125, 4way xo, seems more complete
looks like plenty of options to do the xo/EQ combo thing ![]() Project 125 big question is still how, or maybe even why |
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
|
I'm not sure I am understanding this fully, but I am currently trying to make an two way active crossover where I can vary the crossover frequency and order (and therefore phase) for each way. The best setting I have so far is first order (ish) for the woofer - I think it is already rolling off first order on its own, and second order for the tweeter. This arrangement seems to get better phase between the two drivers than second order on each.
Is this something like you are trying to do? Brian |
|
|
|
|
#29 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
Project 125 is a crossover
Quote:
It does not show what may need to be done to correct for driver anomalies. |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Parametric EQ values? | Elbert | Analog Line Level | 16 | 19th July 2012 03:53 PM |
| Open Baffle active Xo/EQ/Amp design | Zicdave | Multi-Way | 0 | 15th May 2012 09:55 AM |
| Parametric EQ project | ianmgreen | Construction Tips | 12 | 2nd April 2011 11:21 PM |
| LM3886, Leach Amp, Active XO, Subwoofer EQ, Mic Preamp, Joshua Tree, FE103E, More! | wigginjs | Swap Meet | 27 | 20th September 2008 09:32 AM |
| Digital active XO+eq using a PC+soundcards+BruteFIR? | tcpip | Multi-Way | 62 | 27th April 2006 04:34 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |