Building a Tee attenuator - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Source & Line > Analog Line Level

Analog Line Level Preamplifiers , Passive Pre-amps, Crossovers, etc.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 5th May 2012, 11:51 AM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
dimkasta's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Athens
Default Building a Tee attenuator

I am designing a 0-45db stepped Tee attenuator for my rig.
I have chosen to do this over my existing L-pad because of various advantages.

My issue is how to properly select input and output impedance.

My sources have 27R and 600R impedances respectively.
My amp has 330K impedance.

I currently use a lightspeed attenuator which basically works as an 8k L-pad attenuator.

What I was thinking is to use at first a 9K - 50R combination which will allow me to go from 45db up to 28db.
And then increase the ouput impedance slowly and incrimentally to allow for lower attenuation.
100R will allow ~25db
200R for ~22db
400 for ~19db
800 for ~16db
1600 for ~13db (my usual top volume)
3200 for ~10db
and so on

Any ideas/suggestions?
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th May 2012, 01:55 PM   #2
DF96 is offline DF96  England
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Why? T pads are used when you want to maintain particular in and out impedances e.g. for RF. In audio the requirement is different (and simpler): as high as possible at the input (so you don't load the source), as low as possible at the output (so you can drive the load and any cable). An L-pad does this, which is why L-pads are used.
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th May 2012, 04:06 PM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
dimkasta's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Athens
Well the tee is a design decision that serves and solves other design issues in my pre.

And about the L pad, it controls only the input impedance. The output is low on low volumes but varies widely as the volume increases and can reach easily 1,5k or more
__________________
Second harmonic and semi-sweet wine for everyone...
The DIY Tone! | Shigaclone
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th May 2012, 03:01 AM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Evening Dimitri,
Your system sounds pretty well thought out with a nicely high amp 330kR and the sources 27R and not so nice 600R - if the 10:1 rule still applies, input Z of the attenuator should be above 6kR so the 9kR design point looks pretty okay.

If the amps input Z is 330kR, then your increasing output reistance setting would come out to something like 33kR for a possible zero attenuation hich is still within that 10:1 rule of thumb ratio - This has a strange "feel" about it but I can't give any reason for it.

If you were to initially choose the same 9kR value (and reduce it progressively later), this would a simpler start and also keep the 2 series LDRs approx equal value - don't think you need to go down to anything like 50R o/p Z - just my opinion, no facts, and it's been some years since I last looked T, Pi and H pads.

Sometimes these impedance "rules" are totally U/S - my cd player's has 2 o/p stages (low Z of the 627 IC and 200R of the DCB1), but the amp's inputZ is only 9kR (the FirstWatt F3) - the standard lightspeed gives a reasonable sound but not so clean on the bass with the low source impedance - the suprising thing is that this doesn't deteriorate much with the higher 200R source resistance of the DCB1 - not sure why.

The strangest thing is that Alan Flores' unit (the Warpspeed, supposed Z of 5kR) also uses the L-pad configuration but is completely untroubled by the low amplifier impedance of 9kR amplifier - the low bass clarity and accuracy is a real surprise and is the most transparent vol control I've heard without any extra treble "peak" or distortion - no idea why this is so, but very happy about it, naturally!

(naturally, it would be better to add a buffer in front of the F3, and will possibly be required when I add the Aikido gainstage in the system, but who knows .... and a T-pad vol control might make it unnecessary.)


I'm playing around with Uriah's LighterNote and it'll be interesting if I can get the o/p Z down to about 1kR without totally stuffing up the source loading - one of the guys uses it successfully infront of his amplifier that has an input load of less than 4kR and it works perfectly, so suprising things about these 'so-called' simple lightspeed gadjets!

This is the first time I've seen a serious attempt at something other than the basic L-pad - congratulations. You've just become a 'guru'!
__________________
... jh
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th May 2012, 12:52 PM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
dimkasta's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Athens
guru... that s a lol

The biggest issue with the tee so far is the increased accuracy required. In the range of 1/10th of an Ohm.
Especially since I plan on doing it with LDRs where there is easily some fluncuation of 2-3ohms / 1-2 secs either due to temp changes, or due to psu instabilities.

I think I am losing interest quickly...
I am back looking at buffers...
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th May 2012, 01:56 PM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
A series voltage reg and a current pump takes care of the power supply variations (like Uriah's system) and physically coupling the ldrs together eleviates the temp drift, or keeps it same for all devices.

I'm a bit puzzled as to what element of the T requires 100mR accuracy? As the network increases in sophistication, the individual element accuracy actually reduces as the whole network absorbs much of the variation - or, in other words, with the same matching of the devices in a T network instead of an L-pad, the relative accuray or channel impedances will be much closer.

Buffers can introduce their own signature, unfortunately and the most common one is signal compression, just what we're trying to get away from with standard vol pots. The B1 or the complementary version (k170/j74) work pretty well but do require good supplies.

... my 2c.
__________________
... jh
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th May 2012, 02:10 PM   #7
AndrewT is online now AndrewT  Scotland
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
I too am lost on the logic that claims that a T attenuator is better for audio volume control.

A T attenuator would be great if one has a 75ohms source feeding a 75ohms cable into an attenuator, which then drives another 75ohms cable feeding a 75ohms receiver.
If HF is being handled then the matching of impedances at each handover is important to passing an undistorted HF signal.
__________________
regards Andrew T.
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th May 2012, 02:15 PM   #8
diyAudio Member
 
Frank Berry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Midland, Michigan
Daven made "T" audio attenuators many years ago. They were used in vacuum tube mixing consoles where 600 ohm input sources needed to match the mixing buss which was transformer-coupled to the Program line amplifier.
This was back in the days when all "broadcast" gear used input and output transformers.
__________________
Frank
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th May 2012, 02:23 PM   #9
AndrewT is online now AndrewT  Scotland
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
Quote:
Originally Posted by dimkasta View Post
......... The output is low on low volumes but varies widely as the volume increases and can reach easily 1,5k or more
Yes, that applies to all unbuffered volume controls.

This is easily solved by adding a buffer such that the Source (vol pot) can drive the cable, or by eliminating the cable and attaching the vol pot directly to the Receiver circuits, i.e. inside the Receiver and preferably on the PCB right next to the input device/s.

The output impedance itself is not the demon, It is the interaction of output impedance and parasitic/deliberate capacitances that can become the demon.

BTW,
at and near maximum volume, the output impedance is equal to, or very nearly equal to, the Source impedance.
__________________
regards Andrew T.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Building a Hafler XL-10 Excelinear attenuator circuit HaflerFreak Solid State 4 8th September 2010 11:02 PM
Tee nuts in the UK? Pbassred Multi-Way 11 20th June 2008 08:48 AM
A Tee-Vee T00b Amp Miles Prower Tubes / Valves 43 22nd October 2007 12:16 AM
Is this passive attenuator woth building? Thunau Solid State 1 5th November 2006 06:03 PM
Hurricane propeller propel tee nuts net-david Multi-Way 18 8th May 2004 09:09 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:32 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2