Cello Palette Style EQ Design (was High End Tone Control)... - Page 11 - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Source & Line > Analog Line Level

Analog Line Level Preamplifiers , Passive Pre-amps, Crossovers, etc.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
View Poll Results: If you where to build a Cello Palette functional clone, what technology do you want?
I want a Software Palette, Analogue EQ is SO 20th Century 8 16.67%
I want a purely passive EQ to which I want to add my own input buffer and output amplifier (MPPJBTS) 9 18.75%
I want a Minimalist discrete EQ using Tubes (ZenEQ derived from the "East German EQ") 15 31.25%
I want a Minimalist discrete EQ using Solid State (ZenEQ derived from the "East German EQ") 22 45.83%
I want Op-Amp's with parallel and summed bands (e.g. NitePro EQ3D) 5 10.42%
I want Baxandall Sections with Op-Amp's connected in series (e.g. Carl_Huff) 3 6.25%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 48. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 13th April 2012, 09:25 PM   #101
Previously: Kuei Yang Wang
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Hi,

Quote:
Originally Posted by danielwritesbac View Post
What did you think of my highly doable economy version ideas at post 86?
Sure, go for it. As it say's in the Nike Add's - Just do it!

Ciao T
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th May 2012, 07:23 PM   #102
diyAudio Member
 
danielwritesbac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
SO, that's where it died? Lots of big iron transformers plus a few tubes at a lot of expense for a little job? It looks like personal preferences polluted this project and turned it into (#^@&*!!!) something applicable to only a few people. Why not learn from that, and re-do it in a more efficient way that would be more widely applicable?

Otherwise, I dislike the wild goose chase.
__________________
Tools, Models & Software for DIYClipNipper boostLM1875 TurboPowerful TDA7293 kitTDA7294 pt2pt ♦ My post has opinion.
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th May 2012, 07:59 PM   #103
EUVL is offline EUVL  Europe
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
There is enough information for anyone to go ahead as he see fits.
I don't see why it has to be a common solution for all.

This is called DIY after all.


Patrick
__________________
xen-audio.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th June 2012, 10:33 PM   #104
Join is offline Join  Norway
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThorstenL View Post
Folks,

I had the chance today to run the "ZenEQ" concept through Tina-Ti. This is not necessarily meant to be a final design, rather a quick study how a simple circuit may perform.

This reminded me that if we require a more or less proportionate boost in dB vs. rotation we need to use potentiometers that are "S" curve, not linear. These are hard to get these days.

If using linear pots then the adjustment range gets bunched up towards the extremes. This is not necessarily a bad thing, as it makes very small adjustments very precise, the downside is that if we need a lot of correction we are left with very little usable travel.

If using switches as controls this is of course of no consequence at all, as we simply can select the correct resistances to give correct dB/vs. Attenuation.

Attached is Tina-Ti File I used (needs latest version) and some simulation results, all using 10K//1nF load. I am not sure how accurate the models buld into Tina-Ti are etc., but it would seem okayish for ballpark.

I would specify 2SK170 BL or V for the circuit, Tina-Ti lacks the model, so I made up a compound from 2N3819 & a PNP BJT, 2SK170 will show worse THD. I am for now showing ideal chokes, they can be replaced by gyrators, but I lack the time right now. For the LF choke 2H with < 120 Ohm DCR are needed, I do have a few such around, so we know they can be made.

The schematic looks like this:

Click the image to open in full size.

The curves produced by stepping the pots in 10% intervals (this is equivalent to rotating linear pots 10% of the rotation for each step):

Click the image to open in full size.

The frequency response with controls perfectly centred (impossible with pots) looks like this:

Click the image to open in full size.

The LF rolloff is a result of the 2.2uF coupling capacitors shown. I habitually use this value, it works fine IME.

To illustrate two interesting EQ results, here what it looks like with all controls set halfway towards maximum cut from neutral:

Click the image to open in full size.

This illustrates rather well how the various bands combine and with a weighting that is similar to the ISO Equal loudness peaks and through...

And here a EQ setting that can help with modern overproduced recordings, by cutting back presence and "kick" bass, and dialing the extremes up, all just a touch:

Click the image to open in full size.

The required pot settings for this (0 = centre, 0.5 is half way between zero and the respective end, linear pots assumed) are:

15Hz = +0.5
120Hz = -0.5
500Hz = +0.2
2KHz = 0.0
5KHz = -0.8
20KHz = +0.6

Here harmonics for 1V out which adds up to 0.005% THD according to Tina-Ti:

Click the image to open in full size.

and for 4V out which adds up to 0.05% THD according to Tina-Ti:

Click the image to open in full size.

Clipping (1% THD) is at 5V.

Tina-Ti has a seriously funky way of showing noise, anyway, it works out ot -120dB unweighted re. 1V, which seems too good to be true. Still, might be on the money:

Click the image to open in full size.

I hope all of this gives people some ideas for the "ZenEQ" and what sort result could be possible, to see if it is worth proceeding. To me the performance looks acceptable, we can get better measured results using Op-Amp's, but I doubt the sound will be improved.

Ciao T
Hi Thorsten!

Have you been doing any more work on the final design of the Zen-EQ? Words like ballpark tell me that this is not the final "result".

Personally I would like a tubed version of the Zen-EQ. I have been checking in and reading this thread on a regular basis..

-join-
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd December 2013, 03:17 AM   #105
Account disabled at member's request
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Somewhere in Quebec
IS this project has even been done by someone? I'm really interested. I nwould like to add control in the bass section, something like 45 hz, 80, hz, 120hz, 200hz. All the bass FREQ could be control with op amps I think with minimal sound quality loss? Can anyone tell me how to do this?
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cello Audio Palette Nrik Analog Line Level 70 6th January 2014 06:00 PM
Best chip for digital tone control in high-end preamp ? bongo1 Parts 11 18th June 2013 02:12 AM
High End Tone Control EUVL Analog Line Level 144 1st April 2012 07:11 PM
Tube eq or tone control - how to design it? marz.tv Tubes / Valves 5 20th July 2009 01:01 AM
Cello Palette voltage change? young_pup Solid State 3 27th September 2006 11:23 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 03:03 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2