|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Analog Line Level Preamplifiers , Passive Pre-amps, Crossovers, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
|
Still fine tuning my active bass/midrange xovers. Mids to tweeter is passive, and needs no adjustment. I wonder if using all-pass delay stages will provide any benefit to the bass/mid transition? I do not have a way to measure phase of the drivers. The xover is 4th order LR @ 220 for 8" woofers, 2nd order BW @ 300 for the 4" mids. Amplitude looks good on paper, but I can hear something in the lower mids that's not quite right. Horizontal difference is between one and two inches, vertical is 28" C-T-C between the two most spaced drivers, M-T-M-WW configuration.
Has anyone successfully used delay between midrange and woofer? Peace, Tom E |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Hi,
No, when your talking about 2" for wavelengths about 3-4ft. Your problem might be related to lack of baffle step correction and / or related to the mid units fundamental resonance, its hard to say with full modelling details. TBH your arrangements for BSC sound (sic) non-existen Delay for bass to mid never, sometimes for mid to treble. rgds, sreten. http://sites.google.com/site/undefinition/diy (see if nothing else, the excellent FAQs) http://techtalk.parts-express.com/sh...d.php?t=219617 http://www.zaphaudio.com http://www.zaphaudio.com/ZA5/ http://www.rjbaudio.com/Audiofiles/FRDtools.html http://web.archive.org/web/200909021...esigningXO.htm http://www.rjbaudio.com/ http://web.archive.org/web/200909022...ve99/Spkrbldg/ http://speakerdesignworks.com/ http://www.htguide.com/forum/showthread.php4?t=28655 http://www.deadwaxcafe.com/vzone/david/david.htm http://www.troelsgravesen.dk/Diy_Lou...r_Projects.htm http://www.humblehomemadehifi.com/download.html http://www.quarter-wave.com/ http://www.frugal-horn.com/ http://www.linkwitzlab.com/ http://www.musicanddesign.com/ Great free SPICE Emulator : http://focus.ti.com/docs/toolsw/fold...t/tina-ti.html
__________________
There is nothing so practical as a really good theory - Ludwig Boltzmann When your only tool is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail - Abraham Maslow Last edited by sreten; 8th February 2012 at 08:37 PM. |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Orange County, CA
|
When I worked for a major pro audio speaker manufacturer we put a time delay of 83 micro seconds for every inch the LF driver's dust cap was forward of the MF driver's dust cap. And that has 83 micro Seconds delay for every inch in front of the HF driver's diaphram. We had the HF driver furthest back in the enclosure. So the way we made them was with no delay on the HF, delay on the MF and still more delay on the LF.
However, on home speakers, the LF is the furthest from the listener and the HF the closest. Therefore, one would delay the MF as needed and the HF a bit more. The rule is 83 micro seconds per inch of front to rear separation between drivers.
__________________
Dan Fraser |
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Quote:
Driver offsets in typical 2 way bass/mid & treble speaker can be compensated by making the x/o (acoustic curves) assymetric. The phase shifts at bass to mid x/o are far higher than 83uS, and any assymetry in the acoustic responses (very likely) will cause far higher delays than that caused by driver acoustic offsets. The effective acoustic offset of a driver may not be the dust cap.
__________________
There is nothing so practical as a really good theory - Ludwig Boltzmann When your only tool is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail - Abraham Maslow |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
|
Is there an active circuit that will compensate for the phase shift, or do you believe it is not audible and therefore not worth attempting? I am not as worried about the physical driver offset (because of the low xover frequency) as I am about the phase shift between LR4 and BW2 I am using. Perhaps my initial post was not clear.
Peace, Tom E |
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| delay line settings to time-align DTS-10 tapped horn to mids & high drivers | cyclecamper | Subwoofers | 4 | 20th April 2011 06:52 AM |
| Recomnbed woofers/Mids for punchy yet deep bass? | xenu | Multi-Way | 14 | 21st April 2009 02:32 AM |
| Which aleph for the bass and mids? | Selfmade | Pass Labs | 5 | 22nd July 2008 06:25 PM |
| Mids/Bass driver for TDL | Fossil | Multi-Way | 2 | 14th February 2006 11:45 AM |
| Bass interference with mids | fr0st | Multi-Way | 12 | 16th January 2003 09:36 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08641 seconds (80.19% PHP - 19.81% MySQL) with 10 queries |