|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Analog Line Level Preamplifiers , Passive Pre-amps, Crossovers, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Western Sydney
|
My current setup is DVD player – selector switch – passive master vol – passive line level xo – amps
I’m thinking of adding a couple buffer op amps to compensate for any losses in all that passive wiring, My question is - where in the chain is the best place to put them? I’m thinking after the pllxo, so I have some line driving capability & have my dvd player & vol control close to my beer, while the amps are close to the speakers…
__________________
Impedance varies with frequency, use impedance plots of your drivers and make crossover calculations using the actual impedance of the driver at the crossover frequency |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
|
Without seeing the actual circuit, probably after the VC.
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
|
Yes , after the potentiometer . But...which value is this pot ?
And...what impedance it sees ? The rule that in line stages the output impedance should be at least 1/10 than the next stage become true when a pot is in the circuit :the series resistance and the parallel ( to ground ) resistance , they form a lowpass filter when 'seeing' the capacitance associated to the circuit following ( also Hp , but it is less audible ) , so this brings to BW restrictions , depending at which point the cursor is . So it's better to use pots that are less than 50 KΩ for this reason . The buffer makes the series resistance ( plus capacitance...hidden ) negligible . |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Western Sydney
|
re:'which value is this pot ?' - good question, I'll have to get out the screwdriver & have a look, & work out the impedance levels at each stage...
after the pot makes sense, but the pllxo likes to see a constant impedance too edit: the Vol pot is 50K, the 1st order xover LP filter is 15K6 in line, .047uF to ground, HP filter is .139uF in line & 5K6 to ground, as long as the HF amp has an input impedance ~> 10x that I should be ok???
__________________
Impedance varies with frequency, use impedance plots of your drivers and make crossover calculations using the actual impedance of the driver at the crossover frequency Last edited by PeteMcK; 23rd January 2012 at 09:06 AM. |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
|
Pete
I'm not very versed into electronics (neither in speakers but I know the impedance of an amplifier is given by the resistor at its input , that's why you contemplate it into the equation for obtaining R and C values in the filters . I see that ,looking at some posts about Nelson Pass buffer , most people put buffers before and after the RC nets . That consists in only two ( well matched ) active components ,fet or bjt , that allow to have a high impedance at their input and capable of driving loads > 1KΩ ( better 2 KΩ ) . About potentiometer value ... it's got also to do with the Johnson noise . I don't know what a fully feedback configuration with an ICcould do with the 'sound' . At this point ,it would be better to put the IC into the path of the filter ( Sallen & Key ,LR ,etc ),and see/listen to the active crossover . |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Chatham, England
|
I'm not phobic about opamps, so I'd just use an OPA2134, one stage after the PLLXO, and one after the pot.
__________________
Al I conceive of nothing, in religion, science or philosophy, that is more than the proper thing to wear, for a while. Charles Fort |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Western Sydney
|
the specs for the DVD play say 10K load impedance... so anyone have opinions on the optimum value of volume pot?
Pinkmouse, I'm probably going to use OP27s (scavenged few recently), your solution is probably optimal, but with 6 op amps, it's almost at the point where I might as well go fully active.... hmmm, perhaps I could make the volume pot part of the feedback network of the first op-amp if I could maintain relatively high input impedance... I'm going to have to read up on op amp circuitry....
__________________
Impedance varies with frequency, use impedance plots of your drivers and make crossover calculations using the actual impedance of the driver at the crossover frequency |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
A buffer becomes necessary if the source equipment cannot properly drive the load/ receiver equipment.
That load seen by the source is a combination of the Rin of the receiver plus the RF attenuation fitted to the receiver input plus the cable connecting source to receiver. One could have, at the high end, an effective 100k//100pF as the total load seen by the source, ranging down to 1k//2nF (or worse) for the most demanding of loads. A passive pot does not perform well into low resistance loads. Similarly the Passive pot does not perform well into high capacitance loads. A poorly designed piece of equipment may similarly not be capable of driving some commonly seen loads. This inability of the source to drive the load adequately is met by fitting the buffer at the output of the source. The buffer cannot work at the input to the receiver, since the source will still see the cable as part of the load. |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
|
DVDP - 10k pot - LM4562 - parallel passive filters - amp inputs.
If you have no analogue sources, DVDP - DSP xover - 4 gang VC - poweramp inputs. |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Western Sydney
|
re:'DVDP - 10k pot - LM4562 - parallel passive filters - amp inputs' - that looks like the simplest & most effective option (& easiest for me to implement
)Thanks for the input guys
__________________
Impedance varies with frequency, use impedance plots of your drivers and make crossover calculations using the actual impedance of the driver at the crossover frequency |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Adding pre-out to an integrated amp | schubert | Solid State | 30 | 1st November 2011 09:57 AM |
| Adding mass to Peerless passive radiator | Dave Jones | Subwoofers | 0 | 1st December 2010 07:34 PM |
| Adding a pre out before the chip | meepers | Chip Amps | 5 | 8th November 2008 12:16 AM |
| Adding Pass through input on my pre-amp | RollE2k | Parts | 3 | 27th June 2008 03:47 PM |
| Adding a pre-out to receiver | Dave Bullet | Solid State | 9 | 13th January 2003 07:13 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |