Designing a versatile pre with balanced and unbalanced in/out

Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
I made some diagrams:
1) Yellow and green boxes represent two different chassis.
2) The thick connection are balanced signals the thin are SE
3) The dotted are external cables.

The last picture contain a question, whose answer I am not sure, most probably depends on the implementation.

Commenting on Thorsten suggestion, the only thing I do not like is that for SE signals that go to SE amps, you have double conversion back and forward. I was trying to minimize the signal manipulation, but mine could just be a misconception of how things work.

The proposed solutions allows great flexibility, beside the fact that I already have the SE amp, and the converter.

I like them all for different reasons:
Option 1 because the two devices are by themselves kind of flexible.
Option 2 because all the cabling is balanced. In reality I do not have big issues with ground loops, so...
Option 3 one power connection less in the rack.

All minor things.

Thanks,

Davide
 

Attachments

  • Pre01-option1.jpg
    Pre01-option1.jpg
    98.8 KB · Views: 374
  • Pre01-option2.jpg
    Pre01-option2.jpg
    99.9 KB · Views: 361
  • Pre01-option3.jpg
    Pre01-option3.jpg
    86.8 KB · Views: 348
  • Pre01-option3.5.jpg
    Pre01-option3.5.jpg
    99.6 KB · Views: 301
Member
Joined 2009
Paid Member
Ciao Davide,
Thank you for the diagrams. I was hoping to avoid two volume controls even if I understand that two conversions will be required when using SE source and SE amp in this case. I have attached a diagram of what I have in mind.
Cheers,
Nic
 

Attachments

  • UniPre1.jpg
    UniPre1.jpg
    96.1 KB · Views: 301
Davide,

Commenting on Thorsten suggestion, the only thing I do not like is that for SE signals that go to SE amps, you have double conversion back and forward.

First, I must say that I generally come from an "SE" viewpoint towards things. While fully differential circuits have some advantages (and disadvantages) compared to single ended circuits I would say that the implementation is by far more critical than anything else.

Being basically also a "fan" of transformers my personal solution to mixing SE and Balanced freely would of course be a TVC "passive preamp", possibly pre-buffered with a balanced DCB1 section or similar and a transformer designed to give more "gain" as option.

If I already had an SE Preamp I really liked would probably keep it and just add an input transformer in front of the volume control and add balanced ins and use balanced input switching ahead of the transformer (and operate the SE Inputs also as "floating balanced". You can see this style of inputs in various of Sy's preamp designs, including the Impasse.

You now have a SE Preamp which has transformer coupled SE and Balanced inputs that are being treated equally.

You can keep the SE outputs as is, for balanced outputs just add an output transformer, or again, use the output transformer to drive both SE and balanced outputs with full isolation optional (this will help even for SE).

Note that as such there is no BAL/SE or SE/BAL conversion ongoing, just transformers. Transformers don't "know" if the source or load is balanced or not, they simply react to voltage/current between two points and output voltage/current between two other points.

Of course you may feel that the two transformers hopelessly compromise fidelity, then maybe you have to such a kludge as you have shown.

In this case my gut feeling would be to make an preamp with a true balanced input (in other words it always reacts to the difference between two points, one of which may be ground) so it accepts balanced and single-ended sources equally and to accept that the SE output is one phase of the balanced output signal.

Ciao T
 
I like the "democratic" approach of transformers, that does not really differentiate between SE and balanced :).

I am listening not to the ESS9018 with the transformer, not bad at all. I am trying to make my own opinion about the use of transformer. Here in Japan there is a good production of audio transformers, but the prices are over the sky. You can easily pay 700 $ for two input transformers, while the Jensen are just 200 $.

D.
 
Hello guys. This thread was a very nice read :)

I came here trying to find a way to connect my Audio Research PH3 and EAR 834p phonos to a passive dact and then to my balanced only input Electrocompaniet AW120DMB

I was planning to work something with the JT-11p-1 according to the as060 application note from Jensen.

attachment.php


Probably what Nikon did on the wooden box of his son right? :)

Sorry to jump in the middle like that, but could you please help me to better understand that part of phase splitting and how it would affect the impedance matching? What resistors should I use to better match input and output?

Thanks a lot
 

Attachments

  • jensen.jpg
    jensen.jpg
    22.6 KB · Views: 728
Hi,

I came here trying to find a way to connect my Audio Research PH3 and EAR 834p phonos to a passive dact and then to my balanced only input Electrocompaniet AW120DMB

Some notes first, the EAR 834P does not do well with low impedance loads, it should be used with a 100K Attenuator or Pot.

Using such you stand absolutely zero chance of driving a transformer, unless you add a buffer.

So I would suggest a 100K attenuator combined with the DCB1 Buffer and then a line output transformer from Jensen, JT-11-BMCF would be good. This would be quite close in concept and mostly parts to the Steve McCormack "Virtual Reality Engine" preamplifier that sells for a lot of money, if possibly not quite to the same level.

If balanced inputs are needed as well then adding a Jensen JT-11P-1 to handle this will do splendidly.

So for SE Inputs the circuit would be:

RCA Input ->
Input Selector ->
DACT 100K Attenuator ->
DCB1 Buffer PCB ->
Jensen JT-11-BMCF ->
XLR & RCA Outputs

For Balanced Inputs the circuit would be:

XLR Input ->
Jensen JT-11-P1 ->
Input Selector ->
DACT 100K Attenuator ->
DCB1 Buffer PCB ->
Jensen JT-11-BMCF ->
XLR & RCA Outputs

Outputs from the Jensen JT-11-BMCF can be SE or Balanced but not SE & Balanced mixed.

Ciao T
 
What if we keep the internals in balanced topology?

I mean for RCA inputs:
RCA input ->
Jensen JT-11-P1 (1:1+1) ->
Input Selector ->
Attenuator ->
Jensen JT-11-BMCF ->
XLR & RCA Outputs

and for Balanced inputs it would be
XLR Input ->
Input Selector ->
Attenuator ->
Jensen JT-11-BMCF ->
XLR & RCA Outputs

For attenuator I am thinking of building a custom one in Balanced T (H) topology to preserve input and output impedance.
 
Hi,

as far as I know the for DCB1 25k is the maximum value for pot recommended.

Given the B1 buffer is basically just a J-Fet, it has very high input impedance. I cannot see why anyone would limit the value pot ahead of it to something as low as 25K.

100K should be just fine. I would ask for the rational behind the 25K limit.

Ciao T
 
new RelaiXedSMD DIY preamp available

Hi readers for a balanced pre-amp:
I would just like to show the availability of my latest RelaiXed design: a renewed implementation on a more compact PCB due employing more SMD components:
- 4 single-ended and 4 balanced inputs, balanced outputs
- The metal-can LME49720 opamps provide really good sound.
- No 'plastic' capacitors in the signal path (only a Mica for high-frequency decoupling)
- very low-noise/clean powersupply for these opamps
- volume and balance control through relays and remote control
- PIC microcontroller software is open-sourced, controls amplifier board through I2C
see: RelaiXedSMD -- Documentation
 
Hi,

Please consider this simple SE to Balanced circuit, that only use one active NPN transistor. Only local feedback is in play here, so you shall expect it to sound very open and dynamic !

THD is very good. 2Vrms@10kHz into 22k = 0.004% THD. (analyzed on one output)

Higher rail voltage will help on lowering THD. Resistors need to be scaled if lower rail voltage is used . The NPN can be almost any standard transistor: BC546

Cheers
 

Attachments

  • NPN-SE-to-BAL-PhaseSplitter.JPG
    NPN-SE-to-BAL-PhaseSplitter.JPG
    335.6 KB · Views: 279
Hi,
Please consider this simple SE to Balanced circuit...
THD is very good. 2Vrms@10kHz into 22k = 0.004% THD. (analyzed on one output)
...The NPN can be almost any standard transistor: BC546
Well-done! Indeed, good results are obtainable with few transistors, and higher power-supply voltages do help. The tiny (1%) imbalance on your outputs would be negligible in practice, results from the transistor Hfe, and would vanish when applying a Fet. It would be nice to see as comparison your distortion-figures when a Fet is inserted. Which circuit analysis program is this?
 
Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.