|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Analog Line Level Preamplifiers , Passive Pre-amps, Crossovers, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: New Zealand
|
Hi All. I have been following the thread on the “Light Speed” and other LDR controls. There are a few issues of note.
1/ Source impedance is relatively low especially around the mid range. 2/ Output impedance is too low for some high impedance input amplifiers. 3/ Despite the “No Pot’ in the signal path, there are at least two in the LED illumination circuit. The following design has no Pots at all, minimum source impedance of 27K and output of around 21K which may still be too low in some cases. I’ m calling it a Shutter light for want of a better name. A shutter is moved across four 25mm long tubes housing the LDRs via a 270 deg cam. The four LEDs are not in line with the LDRs but offset toward the centre point. If they were in line, the source impedance would drop into the 100’s of ohms area in the centre of travel (135 deg). At the centre point both shunt and series LDRs are relatively shaded and both have 13K or so of resistance. As the shutter moves from the centre; move light falls on one and less on the other increasing the source impedance. Alignment and channel matching is done simply by shoving the LED’s one way or another. Response can also be altered by moving them closer to the centre, or just the series one to create a log response. I’m still messing about with this and have yet to do any listening test. You thoughts?
__________________
never re-invent the wheel |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: New Zealand
|
Attached images are of the wiper transfer. A 5 volt supply connected across the LDR's and the control moved in 10 deg steps.
The R curve is the sourse impedance across the LDR's
__________________
never re-invent the wheel |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
|
Interesting, how is this project coming? Any listing impressions yet compared to standard lightspeed? I'd love to see some more pics of the insides of this device as well as a schematic?
thanks MC |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
Hi,
I am confused with the way you describe the impedances. The Source impedance is the output impedance of the Source as seen by the Receiver. The output impedance is that seen by the Receiver. The Source has an output impedance The receiver has an input impedance The LDRs have a source impedance and an input impedance. The Source sees the input impedance of the LDRs. The Receiver sees the output impedance of the LDRs.
__________________
regards Andrew T. |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: New Zealand
|
Hi Andrew. To avoid confusion just consider the LDR network as a standard pot. The plot on the left is the resistance through 270 deg of rotation Across the pot. i.e. top to bottom (the connection to the source, CD etc)
The plot on the right is of the resistance through 270 degs of the wiper to the bottom or earth of the pot ( connects to the amplifier)
__________________
never re-invent the wheel |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: New Zealand
|
Hi MC. Sorry for the delay. Have been away working and haven't got around to doing some serious listening as yet. Will post some more images of the unit apart to give you an idea. I also have CAD drawings I used to construct it, if you are interested.
Cheers, Simon
__________________
never re-invent the wheel |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: New Zealand
|
Here is a pic of the unit. The left half has the LEDS and 270 deg log taper. The right is the shutter and LDR light shafts.
__________________
never re-invent the wheel |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
|
I understand the concept of your design, but if I'm seeing it correctly, it looks like both LDRs are operating exactly the same way, that is it appears they increase and decrease resistance together, whereas one should increase awhile the other decreases. Am I seeing it right?
Mike |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: New Zealand
|
Hi Mike. In the photo you are seeing the bottom half of both channel LDR tunnels. The other two are hidden under the shutter. Would a pic of the shutter half way help. If so I can post one.
Cheers, Simon
__________________
never re-invent the wheel |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: New Zealand
|
Mike. Here is a pic of the shutter at the half way point and of the light tunnels with the LDRs in the ends.
__________________
never re-invent the wheel |
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Preamp: Comparing LDR and buffered LDR | Dr.H | Analog Line Level | 7 | 5th October 2011 01:29 AM |
| Paul Haynes LDR Volume and Balance with Remote Control (lightspeed, Lighter Note) | ua100k | Swap Meet | 2 | 26th April 2011 03:00 PM |
| LDR volume control alternative | seanvn | Solid State | 3 | 17th April 2011 07:00 AM |
| Replacing broken volume control with digital volume control | Gunawan W | Solid State | 19 | 15th December 2010 10:46 AM |
| WTB: LDR-based volume control / pre | jdubs | Swap Meet | 7 | 2nd December 2010 01:50 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11487 seconds (80.27% PHP - 19.73% MySQL) with 11 queries |