bi-amping, passive, active or analog crossover? - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Source & Line > Analog Line Level

Analog Line Level Preamplifiers , Passive Pre-amps, Crossovers, etc.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 1st September 2010, 12:56 PM   #1
panduro is offline panduro  Denmark
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Frederiksberg, Denmark
Default bi-amping, passive, active or analog crossover?

What kind of cross over should i choose?

I am looking to bi-amp a pair of b&w nautilous 805 2 way spakers, and also connect a 12" sealed bass speaker(have seperate amplifier, but no xover) for low end extention.

I am after transparent and honest sound.

the system concists of:

Speakers
B&w 805 nautilus 2 wayspeakers
12" sealed bass speaker

power amps
2 x 110w 8ohm newclassd green(tweeters)
2 x 150w 8ohms diy power amp(midrange)
2 x 150w 8ohm diy power amp(for bass speaker)

Source:
Holfi xsara cd player with vol. control. only analog rca outputs.


Crossover options:

1) passive biamp for the b&w speakers and a digital lowpass filter for the bass 12inch speaker.

+ easy to get it correct, as pross rd the filter for this speaker.
+ cheap as i have a behringer dcx 2495 for lowpass and offcourse the original passive filter.

- not getting full advantage of bi-amp.
- No Hi-pass filter to to remove freqencies below 100-150hz from b&w speakers.
- need to level match tweeter to midrange level.

2) 3-way Active crossover
Using b&w original xover frequencies for tweeter/midrange xover and adding a hipass ot the midrange driver at 150hz to let the 12inch do all the work below that frequency.

+ full advantage of bi-amp.
+ Transparence of no passive filters?

- dont really understand the theori of active filters or how to design them or where to buy them.
still need to match tweeter to midrange and bass speaker level.


3) 3-way Digital xover with behringer dcx2496.

same as in the active filter above, just with options to roll of much steeper and so on.
can easylie mach levels on all drivers.

I tryed to pass the stereo signal though the behringer and to my poweramp driving the b&w speakers, grany and agressive sound, not nice.

If i decide to spend 500-800euro to upgrade it(fx jan diddens upgrades), will it gett good enoughf or will it still be the weakest link.

+ "endless" options

- alot of work getting it all to play together.
- can all those components create a transparant sound, or will it influence the sound to much?


sorry for the way to long post and thanks alot to all that read this far

what do you think?

best regards

panduro

Last edited by panduro; 1st September 2010 at 12:57 PM. Reason: I would lose a spelling contest to a 3 year old...
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd September 2010, 08:42 AM   #2
JanErik is offline JanErik  Finland
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Vasa
I have recently built this: Linkwitz-Riley Electronic Crossover , recommend checking it out.
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd September 2010, 10:57 AM   #3
AndrewT is offline AndrewT  Scotland
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
I cannot recommend any mucking about with a B&W Nautilus that cannot be returned to as new condition!!!!

Adding a high pass filter to the amplifier/s feeding the Nautilus will do no harm. It will simply cut the quantity of lower frequency information that you ask the Nautilus to reproduce.

Adding an amplifier to drive a low bass speaker cannot do any harm to the Nautilus.

Use Linkwitz Riley to guide you through the bass speaker project.

Why did you choose amplifiers with different voltage capability to bi-amp your Nautilus? Both sets of speakers terminals expect to see the same signal voltage, NOT different signal voltages.
__________________
regards Andrew T.
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd September 2010, 01:48 PM   #4
panduro is offline panduro  Denmark
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Frederiksberg, Denmark
Hi, and thanks for the replies.

Hi Jan i have already read that, but i think i need to read it again. have you heard your speakers with another xover? and if so what are your impressions compared to the other filter?

Hi Andrew
That may be a good point, my resale would drop if I coudnt take them back to original finish.
just mucked about, just to see the connections. Its two mini "banana" plug into the tweeter and spadeplugs to the mid/bass driver.
only fidling around woud be at the main binding post where i would have to desolder the original wires and solder new ones in. woudnt be hard to reverse if I leave the wires and passive filter in there.

well, mostly because it was just offered to me used four days ago at a good price and its designed to be tweeter/midrange supply.
I dont know if they are in different in output voltage yet, as i wont get it before next week. just assumed that it would either be the amps voltage that would differ or that the drivers sensitivity wasnt the same..



best regards

panduro

Last edited by panduro; 2nd September 2010 at 01:50 PM. Reason: .
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd September 2010, 03:04 PM   #5
AndrewT is offline AndrewT  Scotland
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
if the speakers are designed to be driven by a single amp and alternatively passive bi-amped, then the voltage sensitivity at the terminals must be the same.
This requires both the bi-amping amplifiers to have precisely the same gain and for their peak output voltage to be similar.

I would be more than tempted to keep the passive bi-amping of the Nautilus and introduce the active stage only for the low bass unit. Then experiment with the active HP and LP filters and some active EQ to try and get a good balance between the three drivers.
__________________
regards Andrew T.

Last edited by AndrewT; 2nd September 2010 at 03:09 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd September 2010, 04:25 PM   #6
panduro is offline panduro  Denmark
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Frederiksberg, Denmark
In passive bi-amping that makes good sense.

why? less work or a better result?

maybe the layout of the filter is very good, but the cross over doesnt seem to have been made with such high quality components(dont se any mundorf m-lytic as i would in a 802 diamand, the powerresister is the one i can get at the local partspusher for 1,5euro).

im not saying youre wrong, just asking why thats your appinion?

best regards

panduro
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd September 2010, 04:34 PM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
Speedskater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Lakewood, Ohio
I'd like to point out that plugging crossover frequency points into a active or digital crossover design will probably not have the same frequency response as the original passive crossover. A whole lot of things go on in a passive crossover that don't show up in the specifications or simplified schematics.
__________________
Kevin
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd September 2010, 04:45 PM   #8
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
 
planet10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Victoria, BC, NA, Sol III
Blog Entries: 5
Andrews suggestion of passive bi-amping the 805s and adding a woofer with low level hi-pass (for the 805) & lo-pass (for the woofers) is most expedient. This is easiest to achieve with 2 identical amps for the 805 (one channel for mid/one for tweeter. This approach does not have the potential of full activem but will likely work better as the passive approach removes the need to re-egineer what B&W have done in terms of EQ and driver matching in the XO, a daunting task requiring knowledge of filter design and measuring kit.

One could fiddle with something like the DCX2496, but that unit would need extensive modification to bring it up to sonic level equal to the 805s requirements.

dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com, frugal-phile.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi
p10-hifi forum here at diyA
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd September 2010, 05:55 PM   #9
cbdb is offline cbdb  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Vancouver
Quote:
Why did you choose amplifiers with different voltage capability to bi-amp your Nautilus? Both sets of speakers terminals expect to see the same signal voltage, NOT different signal voltages.
Isnt that only true if the tweet and woof (in the box) have the same sensitivity?

If I were doing this the first thing I would do is measure the x-over in the speakers. Plug a tone generator (sine wave) into an amp and set so the amp output is 1 volt. If the speakers have any adjustment set them to flat. Then measure the voltage right at the driver terminals (after the crossover) as you sweep (or step) the generator thru an appropriate freq range (concentrate around the crossover freq eg 1k ). ( 40 200 500 750 1k 1.5k 2k 5k 15k )
This should show you the relative levels between woof and tweet (use measurements far from the crossover point, 200hz compared to 5k ), the crossover freq, and how steep the filters are ( if the woof is -3db at 1 k and -9db at 2k its -6db/oct )
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd September 2010, 10:57 PM   #10
AndrewT is offline AndrewT  Scotland
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
Quote:
Originally Posted by cbdb View Post
Isnt that only true if the tweet and woof (in the box) have the same sensitivity?
it is very likely that the two drivers do not have matched sensitivity.
The cross over corrects for that and for any frequency anomalies as well as filtering the signals to the two drivers.

Consider the speaker driven by one amplifier connected to both sets of speaker terminals.
Both sets of speaker terminals see the same voltage drive.
Now separate the terminals and drive them with separate amplifiers. Both sets of terminals expect to receive the same voltage drive to sound as balanced as they did with a single amplifier. Any sound improvement that accrues should be due to separate cables and an easier load on each amplifier.
__________________
regards Andrew T.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Passive bi-amping with gainclone?? steveline Chip Amps 21 22nd August 2008 09:09 PM
bi-amping through passive crossovers ultrachrome Multi-Way 4 31st March 2005 01:14 AM
bi-amping (active crossover) keyser Multi-Way 16 28th January 2005 09:03 PM
passive bi-amping parts eduard Tubes / Valves 25 24th July 2003 11:19 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:56 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2