|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Analog Line Level Preamplifiers , Passive Pre-amps, Crossovers, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#2181 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
I don't have the knowledge to devise the tests required to prove the PSU is stable with input artifacts applied.
|
|
|
|
#2182 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
|
I am finishing my DCB1 build, and since I use will use it with several different amps(one being Aleph 5 monos), I am building it with caps on the output. In post# 295 Salas says to put 1M resisters after the caps so the caps will not be floating. Does this mean to run the caps to the ouput+ and then run the resistors from here to the output-? This is how it appears in the Marra's build photo in post# 342.
|
|
|
|
#2183 |
|
diyAudio Chief Moderator
|
Like this
|
|
|
|
#2184 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: UK, Manchester
|
I'm curious which 10k step attenuator to choose for the hot rod DCB1?
-4x24 Ladder Type -23 step is there any technical advantage in the Ladder? Noticed that many built their buffers with LDRs, is there a dramatic improvement over Dale step attenuator? Last edited by dtses; 5th September 2012 at 12:03 PM. |
|
|
|
#2185 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Toronto
|
The ladder is simpler and much cheaper. I wanted the purest possible sound (fewest possible components in the signal path), so I went with the LDR (buildanamp.com). I relied on the advice of the DIYaudio members who have compared both and can hear a difference.
__________________
Michael |
|
|
|
#2186 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: UK, Manchester
|
cheers Mike,
thanks for the link! I might consider LDR as well. As I've understood the 2nd one I've listed is not of a ladder type, isn't it? |
|
|
|
#2187 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
|
If I understand correctly, the Ladder style attenuator is so called because each step uses two resistors, maintaining the input impedance to the same value at every step.
|
|
|
|
#2188 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Pennsylvania, USA
|
Right, the second one is not a ladder, as it doesn't have enough resistors. It's a series type which works just like a conventional pot, only in increments.
|
|
|
|
#2189 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Toronto
|
Also there is a max of 2 resistors in the circuit at all times. If you do decide to go ladder and remote control is of interest, there are several board-based designs around. Most have more than 23 steps, which allows finer adjustment. A 23 step usually allows for 3dB adjustments where a ladder array can get you to 0.5dB.
__________________
Michael |
|
|
|
#2190 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
|
Quote:
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| dcb1 buffer with shunt reg. | merlin2069er | Swap Meet | 0 | 3rd August 2010 05:25 PM |
| F2 and DCB1 parts selection - please advice! | DQ | Pass Labs | 6 | 25th November 2009 03:20 PM |
| Y B Blue - how blue LED improves the CD playback | Peter Daniel | Digital Source | 176 | 25th September 2003 07:40 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |