An ultra Low Shunt Capacitance way for audio interconnections (LSC configuration) - Page 3 - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Source & Line > Analog Line Level

Analog Line Level Preamplifiers , Passive Pre-amps, Crossovers, etc.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 28th June 2010, 11:37 AM   #21
diyAudio Member
 
jan.didden's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Great City of Turnhout, Belgium
Blog Entries: 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by neazoi View Post
[snip]But at microwave frequencies capacitor B is not formed because the shield reflects the RF even if it is not grounded, like a dish reflects microwaves.[snip]..
I don't think that is how it works. RF or EMI causes a field that sets up current into the cable (screen) which couples into the signal conductors.
That is usually much lower in freq than microwave signals used with dishes, afaik.

jd
__________________
If you don't change your beliefs, your life will be like this forever. Is that good news? - W. S. Maugham
Check out Linear Audio!
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th June 2010, 11:49 AM   #22
neazoi is offline neazoi  Greece
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
So, in either frequencies RF is coupled...
Thus there is no good of using coaxials this way...?
__________________
Great DIY site: http://www.neazoi.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th June 2010, 11:54 AM   #23
AndrewT is offline AndrewT  Scotland
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
it's down to that loop area.
To minimise interference the loop areas must be minimised. This applies to receiving system and transmitting systems.
The AC cable coming into your amplifier should have the flow and return closely coupled together to minimise the radiated field that will affect surrounding equipment.
__________________
regards Andrew T.
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th June 2010, 11:55 AM   #24
AndrewT is offline AndrewT  Scotland
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
Quote:
Originally Posted by neazoi View Post
This is not a technical answer, we are trying to improve things or at least to explore the possibilities.
so you cannot accept the simple answer. Then go and look at how everyone does it? And then try to explain to yourself why they do it that way.
__________________
regards Andrew T.
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th June 2010, 11:58 AM   #25
neazoi is offline neazoi  Greece
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by AndrewT View Post
so you cannot accept the simple answer. Then go and look at how everyone does it? And then try to explain to yourself why they do it that way.
Or ask at the diyaudio...
__________________
Great DIY site: http://www.neazoi.com

Last edited by neazoi; 28th June 2010 at 12:00 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th June 2010, 12:02 PM   #26
diyAudio Member
 
jan.didden's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Great City of Turnhout, Belgium
Blog Entries: 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by neazoi View Post
So, in either frequencies RF is coupled...
Thus there is no good of using coaxials this way...?
I think what you want to do is to insure that the coupling in both the hot and gnd is identical so there is no net interference signal. It's not realistic to expect 100% screening.

jd
__________________
If you don't change your beliefs, your life will be like this forever. Is that good news? - W. S. Maugham
Check out Linear Audio!
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th June 2010, 12:19 PM   #27
neazoi is offline neazoi  Greece
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Since we are talking about coaxials a bit..
the cost of a silver plated twisted cable is very high. RG223 coaxial can be found in low cost and it's internal conductor and shields are silver plater copper. It has a 100pf/m shunt capacitance.

Does it make sense to use coaxial for the speaker cables, the standard way, central conductor positive, shield grounded.
Alternativelly I could rip the shield off and twist the central conductors (and also their insulation) together, to form a twisted cable.

Which one should I prefer for better characteristics?
__________________
Great DIY site: http://www.neazoi.com

Last edited by neazoi; 28th June 2010 at 12:22 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th June 2010, 12:34 PM   #28
diyAudio Member
 
jan.didden's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Great City of Turnhout, Belgium
Blog Entries: 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by neazoi View Post
Since we are talking about coaxials a bit..
the cost of a silver plated twisted cable is very high. RG223 coaxial can be found in low cost and it's internal conductor and shields are silver plater copper. It has a 100pf/m shunt capacitance.

Does it make sense to use coaxial for the speaker cables, the standard way, central conductor positive, shield grounded.
Alternativelly I could rip the shield off and twist the central conductors (and also their insulation) together, to form a twisted cable.

Which one should I prefer for better characteristics?
Unless you are living nextdoor to a radio transmitter, and unless your power amp has the output termination wrong, you won't here a difference either way. So I would go for lowest cost

jd
__________________
If you don't change your beliefs, your life will be like this forever. Is that good news? - W. S. Maugham
Check out Linear Audio!
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th June 2010, 12:47 PM   #29
neazoi is offline neazoi  Greece
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
I am lucky enough to live in an underground.
I have no idea of the twisted cables shunt capacitance though to compare it with 100pf/m coaxial one
__________________
Great DIY site: http://www.neazoi.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th June 2010, 05:48 PM   #30
neazoi is offline neazoi  Greece
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
After your useful advices I have decided to make the speaked cables like this shown in the photo.
They are composed of a pair of RG223 central conductors with thei insulations, twisted together. This ensures minimum dielectric contact and at the same time noise won't affect the cable..?

Is the way I have done it right?


Also, can I use the same configuration for interconnections? Will this impose a gain in relation to the coaxial?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg DSC04060.jpg (7.0 KB, 84 views)
__________________
Great DIY site: http://www.neazoi.com
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ultra-low noise transistors. PCP Solid State 71 8th June 2014 06:03 AM
ultra-low distortion audio oscillator geekysuavo Analog Line Level 16 26th March 2013 03:04 PM
12au7 who has the best ultra low noise ??? prorms Tubes / Valves 3 23rd August 2008 12:40 AM
Ultra low distortion amp eicen Analog Line Level 10 26th February 2008 01:02 AM
Ultra low noise filters tiroth Solid State 14 21st May 2002 10:19 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 05:52 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2