
Home  Forums  Rules  Articles  diyAudio Store  Gallery  Blogs  Register  Donations  FAQ  Calendar  Search  Today's Posts  Mark Forums Read  Search 
Analog Line Level Preamplifiers , Passive Preamps, Crossovers, etc. 

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving 

Thread Tools  Search this Thread 
10th April 2010, 09:21 PM  #1 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2006

Constant Q parametric equalizers (SVF topology)
Hello DIYaudio community!
I'm currently designing a 3 band parametric equalizer based on the 2nd order state variable filter as proposed by W. Kerman, L. Huelsman and R. Newcomb (StateVariable Synthesis for Insensitive Integrated Circuit Transfer Functions). I like its bandpass response because it is really easy to tune. I've read articles about the use of this filter topology as a parametric equalizer (to adjust Q, center frequency and boost/cut). I think the most inspiring I read is the one by Ethan Winer (Spectrum Analyzer and Equalizer Designs) and I used his circuit as a basis. Since I didn't want to copy his circuit I studied to see how I could improve it. One day I read Rane's Constant Q Graphic Equalizers article (http://www.rane.com/pdf/constanq.pdf) and now I'm obsessed with that idea, since I haven't been able to accomplish it. According to the author "The amplitude function must be entirely separate from the bandpass filter function" so I'm using a modified noninverting SVF and bandpass gain is totally independent from Q. Take a look at the graphs I obtained with LTSpice at various levels of boost/cut, you can see that Q is not constant at all levels. I would like to hear if someone has worked or is working on a similar project to share experiences. M. Fricke (Sorry about my bad english) 
11th April 2010, 05:01 AM  #2 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Midwest U.S.A.

If I can find it and digitize will post it here. If I do not remind me via private message. Good luck Sum
__________________
What the other guy saidStanding on the shoulders of giants. New avatar no more little array 
12th April 2010, 04:44 AM  #3 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2006

Thanks Sum, it would be nice to see what real constant q curves look like...

12th April 2010, 04:21 PM  #4 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Midwest U.S.A.

Magic Filter
Wish I could claim this one but I cannot. Please thank Mr. Ike Wakibiashi for this one. He put a lot of work into it. Using half way decent parts I have gotten Q=2000 with this set up, WOW!
He gave this to everyone who ask so I pass it freely to this forums users. Standing on the shoulders of giants, makes me a little taller. Ike was one of those giants.
__________________
What the other guy saidStanding on the shoulders of giants. New avatar no more little array 
16th April 2010, 04:12 AM  #5 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Midwest U.S.A.

Was curious did you get this to work and did it do what you wanted?
Sum
__________________
What the other guy saidStanding on the shoulders of giants. New avatar no more little array 
16th April 2010, 05:18 AM  #6 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2006

Hi Sum:
Thanks for the circuit, I will start "spiceboarding" the circuit, in previous days I was immersed in the noninverting SVF equations, I studied a Rane schematic (http://www.rane.com/pdf/old/pe17sch1.pdf) of an equalizer that used this topology. With the common NI implementation one is unable to achieve Q values lower than 1 (you can using the inverting SVF but then Q is dependant of gain and viceversa). Q can be less than 1 (using the NI SVF only if): a) R107 and R108 resistors are not equal but that will modify gain. b) RC values are not equal (Rane's trick) however I haven't figured out what effect will this imbalance have on frequency and how to tune for the values needed so I will further study it. 
24th September 2011, 09:30 PM  #7 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Winnipeg, Canada

Are there any simpler ones than Winer's circuit that allow boosting/cutting, with the frequency and Q all independent(the response frickecello posted is exactly what I need)? I'd like to build 3 single band parametric EQs and cascade them for conceptual simplicity. The amount of opamps used won't be a problem, but I need a design that doesn't use any dual gang pots.
Last edited by dewasiuk; 24th September 2011 at 09:32 PM. 
24th September 2011, 10:14 PM  #8 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Winnipeg, Canada

Sorry I forgot to mention that I actually need constant Q as well. I gave the response a better look lol.

25th September 2011, 03:19 PM  #9 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Midwest U.S.A.

The trouble is this is a second order function which means two integrators which leads to a dual pot. Do not use audio taper for frequency. Use a quality linear taper instead and my posted circuit will work fine. You could use a digital resistor ladder with some encoder and control circuit or possibly some device set up as a variable resistor. Linear taper dual gang are not so bad as audio taper pots for tracking and matching the linear ideal values.
Good luck and post if you find a suitable circuit.
__________________
What the other guy saidStanding on the shoulders of giants. New avatar no more little array 
Thread Tools  Search this Thread 


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
FS: Behringer CX2310 active crossover plus 2x PEQ2200 parametric equalizers  nl  Swap Meet  6  21st May 2009 04:58 PM 
parametric equalizers  stupid m0nkey  Everything Else  7  16th February 2005 05:49 AM 
Rane 4th order SVF  nuppe  Solid State  4  12th June 2004 09:54 PM 
Recomended Stereo Equalizers?  Audio Addict  Analogue Source  2  6th June 2003 01:13 PM 
New To Site?  Need Help? 