|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Analog Line Level Preamplifiers , Passive Pre-amps, Crossovers, etc. |
|
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#21 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
|
Thanks Mooly, this is the op amp I will be using -
http://docs-europe.origin.electrocom...6b80c8c8e6.pdf I believe I can omit that 3K3 resistor now. And to bring the voltage back to what it was, shall I use a voltage divider network? Is it possible a certain value of Rf will attenuate the signal? |
|
|
|
#22 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
Hi,
an inverting topology allows both gain and attenuation through the amplifier. Reduce the feedback resistor to 5K and you will get a mono signal ~<each stereo signal. That might be too low, so use a pot on the output of the opamp and try 7k5. That should give a range of adjustability, if the drivers are the same sensitivity. Last edited by AndrewT; 15th April 2010 at 03:06 PM. |
|
|
|
#23 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
The OPA134 should be ideal... and yes, the 3k3 resistor can be linked out.
You can use the inverting configuration right down to zero gain i.e. infinite (is the right word ?... maximum attenuation... no output ) attenuation, and that's actually the basis of an "active" volume control.
__________________
------------------------------------------------------- A simulation free zone. Design it, build it, test it. |
|
|
|
#24 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
|
Excellent. I have started on a multisim circuit of the circuit, and everything is working great
Problems I encountered was that I could not get the 4066 or any other 4 series chip working! I found the ADG412 lurking around in the depths of multisim and that worked straight away. I hope there is no problem using this chip. When the chip is set to 'open switch', there is still a small amount of leakage through which is visible when the scope settings are sensetive enough - is this a problem?The output is inverted, what is the circuit using an op amp to invert it back (I'm not sure on how to work out the correct resistor values). Out of interest, how do you work out the correct values of resistors in a unity gain inverting buffer? Do the values matter much? I've attached a screenshot of the circuit for interest sake. ![]() Fullsize http://img41.imageshack.us/img41/827...screenshot.png Last edited by dannybeckett; 15th April 2010 at 10:04 PM. |
|
|
|
#25 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
It seems OK. As with anything you can make it as simple or complex as you want.
You mention leakage. That becomes worse as frequency rises... try it at 20hz... should be virtually non existant. It's caused by capacitive coupling (is all this programmed into your simulation... because this is what happens in reality). Coupling between the legs on the IC package and print on the PCB. Look at my circuit in post #5. That does a couple of things differently. 1. The switch is placed at the inverting input of the opamp. This means that when closed the switch is operating with "no" voltage, signal or otherwise across it. That reduces distortion caused by non linearitys of the FET. It's a small effect... well documented... easy to eliminate. 2. The second FET in my circuit "shunts" the signal to ground when the main switch is open. That totally eliminates breakthrough. R43 etc isn't needed. Your inverting circuit last picture is fine, however remember that the input impedance of the virtual earth amp is the resistance of the "feed" into the inverting terminal. So 5K1 is low, but as it's driven via an opamp before is OK. 10K would be a more usual value in practice. Some opamps such as the TLO71, LF351 etc can't drive loads much below 2 to 3 k at full voltage swing.
__________________
------------------------------------------------------- A simulation free zone. Design it, build it, test it. |
|
|
|
#27 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
|
Thanks a lot for your help. I'm going to redesign it all with all this information in mind.
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
|
I have created quite a successful multisim design (much neater than the previous). No more distortion, levels are all equalized, adjustable low pass filter has been included also.
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
|
I have uploaded a zip archive to rapidshare, containing two Multisim 10 schematics - one which is the fully working circuit, the second is the same circuit with the correct connectors in place. I have also included the PCB layout of the one with the appropriate connectors, using Ultiboard 10.
10 Channel Preamp Schematics I have also rendered some prototype 3D images of the preamp mainboard ![]() ![]()
Last edited by dannybeckett; 19th April 2010 at 01:08 AM. |
|
|
|
#30 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
Good luck with it... I don't use Multisim
__________________
------------------------------------------------------- A simulation free zone. Design it, build it, test it. |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Building the Nathan 10 | markus76 | Multi-Way | 870 | 2nd October 2009 06:38 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |