Go Back   Home > Forums > Source & Line > Analog Line Level
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Analog Line Level Preamplifiers , Passive Pre-amps, Crossovers, etc.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 7th October 2009, 05:26 PM   #11
diyAudio Member
 
wrenchone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Silicon Valley
That's why I'm using the circuit configuration I chose - it allows me to use 50 ohm impedance networks. This is much more managable and may be workable without all the extra components to compensate for strays. Time will tell. Fortunately, we have a very good impedance analyzer at work, so I'll be able to really scope out the inductors once they're wound.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th October 2009, 07:13 PM   #12
diyAudio Member
 
wrenchone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Silicon Valley
Just so folks know what to look for, attached is a picture of some ferrite pot cores, one all canned up with shield and PC mount bottom plate, another disassembled so you can see the slightly separated core halves, the bobbin inside them, the bottom plate, the can, and the wavy washer placed inside the can on top of the core so that the ferrite pieces don't get crunched when the can is clinched tight to the bottom plate. These cores happen to be 42 X 29 mm,pretty much the largest size commonly available. There's a host of smaller sizes, for this application those from 26 X 16 mm upward are probably most suitable.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg POT_CORE.jpg (73.0 KB, 160 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th October 2009, 08:16 PM   #13
diyAudio Member
 
nicoch58's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
I start to build a lcr tube phono ,thorsten design he use the
s&b600 , this one is more simple rispect the tango eq 600 , but riaa is in the 0.3db (0.4) rispect tango 0.2db but this can put the dc bloc caps after the riaa on low value0.1µ
Attached Images
File Type: jpg riaa.jpg (128.8 KB, 154 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th October 2009, 10:37 PM   #14
diyAudio Member
 
wrenchone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Silicon Valley
That's all very fine, but the entire thrust of this thread is to get away from using those networks. There are several other threads dealing specifically with what you're trying to do. A search will find them.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th October 2009, 03:57 AM   #15
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Canandaigua, NY USA
FWIW, inductors are the most impure electronic component. If you spend any serious time measuring them you'll find that only an air core is linear and can achieve really low THD levels, at the expense of size and internal resistance of course. Mounting is always an issue, as even mounting near a copper ground plane changes the characteristics. I've no doubt that the parasitics can be taken care of in the design, but unless one is trying to build a steep and exotic multi-order filter, using inductors seems like more of a novelty than anything else. And this from somebody who actually likes winding and using inductors!
__________________
I used to be an audiophool like you but then I took an arrow to the knee.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th October 2009, 04:18 AM   #16
diyAudio Member
 
wrenchone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Silicon Valley
This is why I'm aiming for low impedance network, again, to reduce the necessary inductance as much as possible. Pot cores with a reasonable air gap are pretty linear, especially as they are seeing low current and low signal levels. The pot core geometry is to a large extent self-shielding - adding the cans as shown in the previous picture kills electrostatic noise coupling. Pot cores were used extensively in the telecommunications industry for precision filters, for good reason. At any rate, I'm trying the inductive filters out of curiosity, and choosing the simplest way to do it that I can think of. I, too, work extensively with inductors, but mostly in the grubby power supply realm - a different matter altogether.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th October 2009, 09:57 AM   #17
diyAudio Member
 
nicoch58's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
wrenchone sorry if you thinks that I disturb your work ,I no need info, I try add as I study for a month in all world wide web

if we can trust Bench-Thortsten-Mayer and a lot skilled diy ,this coil works a lot better then RC riaa at last on tube,as they put under x-ray with real misure....only problem is$$$

best
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th October 2009, 05:25 PM   #18
diyAudio Member
 
wrenchone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Silicon Valley
I'm fully aware of all that, that's why I'm trying this solution. I might also work as a passive solution, but it would require a hefty buffer with a servo circuit to drive it - hence the feedback approach.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Where to by inductive wirewounds? Tweeker Parts 5 14th February 2009 04:43 AM
Non-inductive resistors cathode_ray Multi-Way 5 27th August 2008 10:20 PM
Non inductive resistor ostie01 Parts 23 4th June 2006 09:03 PM
Is this resistor inductive? Jay Pass Labs 11 5th April 2003 02:24 PM
Non-Inductive Resistors rborer Solid State 9 3rd September 2001 09:47 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 06:11 AM.

Page generated in 0.09815 seconds (76.27% PHP - 23.73% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio