|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Analog Line Level Preamplifiers , Passive Pre-amps, Crossovers, etc. |
|
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#31401 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#31402 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Front Row Center
|
Quote:
One like OPA's the other not, how are we to know who to know which is best. i can hear JC interpretation anytime i wish, it's available , how can we hear ESP's OPA setup , where are these great OPA pre-amps ..? I'm not against , I would love to hear ...... |
|
|
|
|
#31403 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: France
|
Quote:
By example, on My Behringer DCX2498, i was obliged to use voltage feedback (cause differential input signals and i wanted to took the output from the out of the second stage) I was very limited because +-15V, 8SOIC, and i don't wanted to modify too much the cms parts. I found this one: THS4012 (310V/µs, Out:110mA, vn:7.5nV/rtHz) But, when it is possible, i prefer to chose current feedback's ones (i have a stock of nice old OPA260, + some in my Rotel preamp). During my researches on Google, in order to find a part, i was looking at people's reports about "the sound" of various OPA they have tested: When people compare parts, they are *always* rated in the order of their slewrate. N°1 is always the highest. Doing like-me, compare with a strait wire ? If no difference nothing can be better. Last edited by Esperado; 13th December 2012 at 11:59 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#31404 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: London
|
Quote:
- JFET input, +/15V - 325MHz unity gain freq. - 80dB open loop gain, -3db @ 30KHz (happens to meet JCs criteria of "open loop bandwidth") - 1000V/uS slew rate - 7.5nV/rtHz noise - 0.01% distortion @G=5 into 100ohm at 5MHz and 2Vpp (much less distortions at audio frequencies). |
|
|
|
|
#31405 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: France
|
Nice to met-you.
(it was a single, while i wanted a couple :-) The best voltage feedback of the market, yes. And, current-feedback, one of the best killers: LME49713 Supply Min (Min) (Volt) 10 Supply Max (Max) (Volt) 36 Special Features Current Feedback Audio Amp, AvCl>2 Vmax (V) 36 THD + N @ 1 kHz (%) 0.0004 Vmin (V) 10 Number of Channels 1 Slew Rate (Typ) (V/us) 1900 Iq per Channel (Max) (mA) 18 BW @ Acl (MHz) 132 BW @ G=+2 (MHz) 107 GBW (Typ) (MHz) 190 Vio (Max) (mV) 2 Offset Voltage Drift (+/-) (uV/Degrees Celsius) 0.29 Vn at Flatband (Typ) (nV/rtHz) 1.9 Noninverting Input Current Noise (pA/rtHz) 16 Iib (Max) (nA) 5000 Io (Typ) (mA) 140 Pin/Package 8TO-99, 8SOIC Approx. Price (US$) 1.45 | 1ku Last edited by Esperado; 14th December 2012 at 01:05 AM. |
|
|
|
#31406 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
__________________
If I disappear suddenly, that means I finally created a time machine and pushed wrong button that brought me to Stalin's Russia. In any experiment any result is the result. Even if it is negative. |
|
|
|
|
#31407 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: berkeley ca
|
Nice part, Waly!
|
|
|
|
#31408 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Which basement in Hauppauge do these come from?
__________________
Clay is embedded in our subconscious. It has been there for at least 50,000 years. |
|
|
|
|
#31409 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
yes it is. But --- you get low thd+n that way also. -RNMarsh
Last edited by RNMarsh; 14th December 2012 at 01:44 AM. |
|
|
|
#31410 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
From the datasheet (see http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/ths4631.pdf ; too large to post directly here) it looks like 0.01% is a little optimistic. But the change in 2nd and 3rd distortions with lighter loading is very encouraging, particularly the 3rd behavior. Note that the figures 7 and 8 are for noninverting gain of 2, which means that common-mode distortion is not much of an issue. It would be interesting to see the curves for inverting mode and light loading. And any buffer in the feedback loop is going to have to be a very fast one. The voltage range is refreshingly large for this fast a part as well. Slew rates are reasonably equal, and 0.01% settling time is specified, so we know it is pretty well-behaved in that respect, which can also be partially inferred from the phase response. Since the open-loop gain is only about 80dB we would not expect the frequency-dependent nonlinearities to be much further reduced with global feedback below the -3dB frequency, and if we want much gain we will have to live with more distortion. But still in all, a nice part. And the voltage noise corner is not too high. The predominant 2nd suggests that if part-to-part matching is good, arrangements with multiple amps can be envisioned to mostly-cancel 2nd and leave almost-only 3rd. |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
| New To Site? | Need Help? |