Go Back   Home > Forums > Source & Line > Analog Line Level
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Analog Line Level Preamplifiers , Passive Pre-amps, Crossovers, etc.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 19th November 2009, 10:12 PM   #2971
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: McKinney, TX
Quote:
Originally Posted by Allen Wright View Post
Contrary to some others opinions, I consider cermet pots to sound seriously better than conductive plastic - from personal listening.

Anyone actually also tried cermet critically?

The Vishay cermet is my favorite - it sounds (to me) just like a two resistor attenuator. But it's low end tracking is hopeless.

Regards, Allen
I have never tried them Allen. Any recommendations on a specific unit? I might investigate this.
  Reply With Quote
Old 19th November 2009, 10:18 PM   #2972
mos57 is offline mos57  Italy
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Catanzaro - Calabria
I not want persuade nobody, but if each experiences is judges only subjective and not objective, then because universally was acceipt that 2A3 is more musical than 6AS7 ?, or that 2A3 mono-plate is better than bi-plate?

Because any makers utilized Dale resistors rather unknow resistors?
I not discover that electrolytic or film caps have proper sound at the end.
If we can spech about its ok, if not no problem, i will go forward to my perceptive sensation.

Francesco.
  Reply With Quote
Old 19th November 2009, 10:30 PM   #2973
fredex is offline fredex  New Zealand
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: New Zealand
I use a 100k Black Alps which has some dc flowing through the wiper, I know this is supposed to be bad but it sounds better than with an extra cap and res. Now after a year I am worried that I maybe shortening the life of the pot. Anyone know about this particular pot?
  Reply With Quote
Old 19th November 2009, 10:31 PM   #2974
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: berkeley ca
Subjective impressions are often at least as valuable as objective ones. Even with tubes, you can measure differences due to manufacture, even if they have the same tube number. I can prove this.
  Reply With Quote
Old 19th November 2009, 11:11 PM   #2975
mos57 is offline mos57  Italy
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Catanzaro - Calabria
Quote:
Originally Posted by john curl View Post
Subjective impressions are often at least as valuable as objective ones. Even with tubes, you can measure differences due to manufacture, even if they have the same tube number. I can prove this.
Thanks, John.

Sometime we can hear differences in sound, but it's more difficult to prove it or at least it is impossible to find differences by electrical measurement.

Not for this reason, people can define this fact as "subjective"

Francesco

Last edited by mos57; 19th November 2009 at 11:15 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th November 2009, 12:12 AM   #2976
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Send a message via Yahoo to kannan_s
Quote:
Originally Posted by john curl View Post
Subjective impressions are often at least as valuable as objective ones. Even with tubes, you can measure differences due to manufacture, even if they have the same tube number. I can prove this.
What type of tests that can reveal - audio attenuator quality ( Assuming Pots are no longer as good as resistor attenuators due to wiper or contact resistance variation issues) ? or whether Precision Bulk foil type resistors perform better as an attenuator than say Metal film resistor with 1% precision?
Kannan
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th November 2009, 12:49 AM   #2977
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: McKinney, TX
Quote:
Originally Posted by kannan_s View Post
What type of tests that can reveal - audio attenuator quality ( Assuming Pots are no longer as good as resistor attenuators due to wiper or contact resistance variation issues) ? or whether Precision Bulk foil type resistors perform better as an attenuator than say Metal film resistor with 1% precision?
Kannan
Listening maybe
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th November 2009, 04:23 AM   #2978
Salas is offline Salas  Greece
diyAudio Chief Moderator
 
Salas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Athens-Greece
Quote:
Originally Posted by Allen Wright View Post
Contrary to some others opinions, I consider cermet pots to sound seriously better than conductive plastic - from personal listening.

Anyone actually also tried cermet critically?

The Vishay cermet is my favorite - it sounds (to me) just like a two resistor attenuator. But it's low end tracking is hopeless.

Regards, Allen
Quote:
Originally Posted by Curly Woods View Post
I have never tried them Allen. Any recommendations on a specific unit? I might investigate this.
Are we talking about a small white double linear one with short shaft and terrible L/R balance at start of rotation? It would not give any signal on one channel at medium whisper level actually! After kicking off was OK for balance though. I used that little thing back in the early 90s, law faked with Vishay's lowest PPM resistors of the time. I got it from a guy named Russ Andrews from Cumbria UK. Was a TT tweaking guy. I don't seem to can find it easily so to take a pic, I am not sure I still got it even, maybe it finally gave up the ghost, but I found its paper from Russ! If it is the same, yes I remember it as the most transparent pot I ever got in my system back then. The bad functionality broke my nerves in the end. After both channels would kick in (grrr!) then it would climb up fast even with 20:1 law fake. I remember that when I substituted it with Alps blue, and then Bourns blue, I could finally control my volume but they were thick as mud in comparison. Irony, and was costly too.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg P11.jpg (149.8 KB, 221 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th November 2009, 06:22 AM   #2979
1audio is offline 1audio  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: SF Bay Area
Cermet may sound quite good at a given setting and may be fine for a trim pot. However as a volume control they can be noisy in operation and wear faster.
I have found that the Vishay metal foil trimmers are the best sounding to me. The Vishay 1280G was the best value of the options. I even figured out how to make it a front panel control- but 20 turns does not make a good volume control.
__________________
Demian Martin
Product Design Services
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th November 2009, 07:12 AM   #2980
mos57 is offline mos57  Italy
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Catanzaro - Calabria
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1audio View Post
Cermet may sound quite good at a given setting and may be fine for a trim pot. However as a volume control they can be noisy in operation and wear faster.
I have found that the Vishay metal foil trimmers are the best sounding to me. The Vishay 1280G was the best value of the options. I even figured out how to make it a front panel control- but 20 turns does not make a good volume control.
Have you compared this Vishay Vs. Spectrol and Bourns trimpot, also?
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 3 (2 members and 1 guests)
john curl, riccoryder
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:04 AM.

Page generated in 1.40291 seconds (13.43% PHP - 86.57% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio