|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Analog Line Level Preamplifiers , Passive Pre-amps, Crossovers, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Southern France
|
Hi all,
what would you say about swapping NE5534 opamps for OPA228? It's for a class-A mosfet-based headphone amp that I designed a few years ago (which sounds very good, although it creates a lot of heat, but that's part of the fun, I guess). I was going to try OPA134 and OPA627, but OPA228 seems like a good alternative... Any opinion? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
the NE5534 makes a little bit more noise, 3,5 instead 3,0nV/SQR Hz. But I have build by the 5534 a good headphone amp sometimes.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Netherlands
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Lyon
|
Hello from France
I made a mosfet amplifier with a AOP to drive the power stage and I tried several AOP like NE5534, OP27, LT1028 etc. The sound of the OP27 was better more clear. The OP228 is a better than a OP27. Ten year later, I think you should choose the better AOP for your configuration. The environment is very important (schema, resistance value etc.) and it can influence the AOP, for example it could be oscillate. Have fun. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Southern France
|
Ok... my headphone amp got a new pair of power resistors (68 ohms/25 W) and a pair of OPA228's... (by the way, the MOSFETs are IRF520's)
Also, this amp has no capacitor in the audio signal path whatsoever and is powered with +/- 15V regulators, separated for left and right (so that's 4 regulators...) This beast is amazing! As compared to the NE5534, OPA228 makes the amp more detailed with better dynamics. High frequencies are maybe a bit harsh though. Or maybe it's just too clean sounding.... |
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| NE5532 vs NE5534 | rumblinbass | Parts | 9 | 14th December 2007 02:24 PM |
| replacing NE5534 AN | pjpoes | Parts | 3 | 23rd January 2007 05:13 PM |
| NE5534 compensation ? | AndrewT | Solid State | 22 | 12th February 2006 10:42 PM |
| Wtb Philip Ne5534 | goto2003 | Chip Amps | 0 | 28th December 2005 03:37 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.07660 seconds (71.64% PHP - 28.36% MySQL) with 11 queries |