Fetzilla Build Documentation - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Commercial Sector > Manufacturers > AKSA

AKSA Builders of market proven kits and modules at sound quality to rival the best in high end

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 28th February 2012, 11:23 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Marblehead Ma
Default Fetzilla Build Documentation

Here's what I've collected and to the best of my knowledge it's all the latest renditions .

The BOM I used as a general guide and ordered resistors and other components to my preferences . not quite sure who that came from . Use at your own risk .


Enjoy , Woody

Folks,

My sincere thanks to Woody, this is the complete FetZilla documentation endorsed by me, now made 'sticky'.
I have also appended here a complete distortion analysis of the FetZilla. Two highly competent EE friends of mine here in Melbourne took distortion measurements of the FetZilla on Monday 27th Feb 2012. They are taken at 1KHz, into an 8R resistive load, at outputs respectively of 1W (+10dB), 13.3W (+20dB), and 26.5W (+23dB):

Fundamental 10.00dB Fundamental 20dB Fundamental 23dB
H2 -93dB 5.012E-10 H2 -78dB 1.585E-08 H2 -78dB 1.58489E-08
H3 unmeasureable H3 -93dB 5.012E-10 H3 -88dB 1.58489E-09
H4 unmeasureable H4 -105dB 3.162E-11 H4 -93dB 5.01187E-10
H5 unmeasureable H5 -102dB 6.31E-11 H5 -103dB 5.01187E-11
H6 -96dB 2.512E-10 H6 -106dB 2.512E-11 H6 -110dB 1E-11
H7 unmeasureable H7 -110dB 1E-11 H7 -101dB 7.94328E-11

H8, H9 and H10 are all unmeasureable

THD by voltage 0.00274% (1W, +10dB); 0.01284% (13.3W, +20dB), and 0.0134% (26.5W, +23dB)
Measurements below about -80 dB can be assumed to be insignificant except in ultraclean designs

These figures are surprisingly good, but with output bias set to 370ma the first 5.5 watts of output are in Class A, so perhaps not so surprising after all.

I would add that the THD does not correlate well with the sound qualilty; rather, it is the profile of the distortion artefacts that affect the perceived sound quality for the human ear.

Not bad for a jfet, two mosfets, and two lateral output fets - only five active devices in total!

My thanks to Graeme and Paul for generously giving their time to measure the FetZilla!

Cheers,

Hugh
Attached Images
File Type: gif FetzillaSCHEM.gif (57.0 KB, 2341 views)
File Type: gif FetzillaPSschem.gif (29.7 KB, 2009 views)
Attached Files
File Type: doc FetZillbuild1.doc (139.5 KB, 414 views)
File Type: pdf FETZILLA-Schematic-5.pdf (33.8 KB, 510 views)
File Type: doc FETzillapartslist.doc (32.0 KB, 333 views)

Last edited by AKSA; 15th April 2012 at 09:38 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th February 2012, 12:18 AM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Marblehead Ma
sorry turns out you can't upload an excel file here , so i .zip ed it
Attached Files
File Type: zip Swordfishy amp BOM.zip (9.2 KB, 228 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th March 2012, 08:33 PM   #3
RonR is offline RonR  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Hi Hugh,

I think the latest Schematic for the PSU can be seen in post 383 of the "Swordfishy/ASPEN FETZILLA power amp" thread Here, where R5 = 10 Ohms rather than the 100 Ohms in this thread. I'm not sure if there are other differences between the versions there and here.

Cheers,

Ron

P.S. My own Fetzilla build has hit a bit of a roadblock at the moment, but more of that later....
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th March 2012, 11:07 AM   #4
AKSA is offline AKSA  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Ron,

You are quite right; in the later version, post #383, I moved to a lower value because I found that the bass was more prominent this way.

No other changes to the sound however, but no one I know passes up more bass!!

You are no doubt reserving your build for the warm summer months!!

Good luck with the project, and thanks for your post,

Hugh
__________________
Aspen Amplifiers P/L (Australia)
www.aksaonline.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th March 2012, 11:43 AM   #5
AndrewT is offline AndrewT  Scotland
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
I changed C12 to maintain time constant.
__________________
regards Andrew T.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th March 2012, 08:07 PM   #6
AKSA is offline AKSA  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Not sure why you bothered, Andrew, makes no difference whatever to the sound quality.....

Hugh
__________________
Aspen Amplifiers P/L (Australia)
www.aksaonline.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th March 2012, 10:26 AM   #7
AndrewT is offline AndrewT  Scotland
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
why bother fitting C12 or even the RC filter if it does not clean up the power rail.
__________________
regards Andrew T.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th March 2012, 10:32 AM   #8
AKSA is offline AKSA  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Because we are endeavouring to reach 'better sound', according to subjective measures, NOT 'clean up the power rail' if this appears to reduce bass.

Remember, this was designed by dedicated subjectivists with absolutely no technical clue, my friend....... go ahead, clean up the power rail, it will undoubtedly improve the specs, after all!

Hugh
__________________
Aspen Amplifiers P/L (Australia)
www.aksaonline.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th March 2012, 10:35 AM   #9
AndrewT is offline AndrewT  Scotland
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
Quote:
Originally Posted by AKSA View Post
........ NOT 'clean up the power rail' if this appears to reduce bass.
Where did this come from?
__________________
regards Andrew T.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th March 2012, 10:10 PM   #10
AKSA is offline AKSA  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Andrew,

If you increase R5 to match the 100R on the other rail, you reduce the half wave rectified 'ripple' and thereby improve the quality of the DC, clean it up, if you will.

Correspondingly, if you leave R5 at 10R and boost the associated capacitor by a factor of ten to preserve the time constant, again, you clean up the rail, no question.

BUT, in both cases, for reasons uncertain, you lessen the bass delivery. Hence the decision we took.

Another reason for this misunderstanding might be that your comment here:

Quote:
why bother fitting C12 or even the RC filter if it does not clean up the power rail
looks very like you are laying down the gauntlet, and I reacted accordingly.

Unfortunately, I say what I say, without ambiguity, and where doubt exists about why, I also say so. I'm certainly not the smartest sausage on the barby, but I strive to do my best.

Cheers,

Hugh
__________________
Aspen Amplifiers P/L (Australia)
www.aksaonline.com

Last edited by AKSA; 12th March 2012 at 12:08 AM. Reason: content
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Swordfishy/ASPEN FETZILLA power amp AKSA AKSA 1167 2nd July 2014 08:29 AM
Group Buy #2 - FETZILLA AKSA AKSA 252 18th April 2014 02:09 AM
Group Buy #3 - FETZILLA, the amp... AKSA AKSA 44 28th September 2012 07:11 PM
Build Documentation beaner Multi-Way 1 23rd February 2010 05:59 PM
MN662720 documentation JacekPlacek Digital Source 0 29th November 2007 08:44 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 01:40 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2