Suitable midrange cone, for bandpass mid in Unity horn.

In reply to Kipman, post 2460:
You're right. That remains to be seen. So far, the whole shabam its just a "paper tiger".
But its great fun, is'nt it ?
Another good question would be: Where will the wired-out-of-phase (notch) frequency be ?
I dont know about 17,2 Khz, or how you get to that figure, but the Hornresp sim. shows a top dip at 5Khz for L=25mm (see post 2446 above), and 4,2Khz using L=30mm. So there is a showstopper at large, overruling the 1/4 wave thing you mention.
ID 12 to 14mm ports should be "acoustically invisible", being only a fraction of the shortest wavelength
When I get those Peerless TC5FC07-04 I think I will start out doing the Vtc studies, as for Rashorn1, to see what we can expect for a top resonance.
This time concentric only, since the main reason for using such small drivers is the possibility of controlling the very top.
 
Somebody else mentioned the problems of mating a monopole bass to horn mids and treble and I heartily agree. I was reminded of my first Unity setup with monopole bass. Now it's dipole and there's no going back--until I have the room to try out my plane-wave/active-echo-cancellation bass idea.

John"

The problem being the omni-directional nature of monopoles?
 
The problem being the omni-directional nature of monopoles?
Giri,

You are asking "Patrick Bateman", whose real first name is John, about an observation shared by "hancock" (first name John) on the High Efficiency Speaker Asylum 20 years ago.
John Hancock.png


Among MEH (multiple entry horn) users, you probably will find more advocates of multiple monopole subwoofers to reduce low frequency room mode problems than those using dipoles.

Art
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users

Attachments

  • 03A4B74A-DCFD-4C8A-9EA0-08F67E333EAB.jpeg
    03A4B74A-DCFD-4C8A-9EA0-08F67E333EAB.jpeg
    52 KB · Views: 126
  • 453E3CA6-F838-4CDB-A954-A15F8D20D721.jpeg
    453E3CA6-F838-4CDB-A954-A15F8D20D721.jpeg
    190.9 KB · Views: 126
  • F8B51AAB-991B-46F2-8F94-A359B1985B32.jpeg
    F8B51AAB-991B-46F2-8F94-A359B1985B32.jpeg
    233.7 KB · Views: 128
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
At a glance, didn't seem good to 1 kHz, but based on this BP4 it will if the tiny chambers can be made.
Thanks for the fact check!
I actually came to a similar conclusion regarding the tiny back chamber on the next test I did. This time I went for a better loading/efficiency.
 

Attachments

  • 4916A99F-9A96-4E73-B3C5-2232E7AF07BB.jpeg
    4916A99F-9A96-4E73-B3C5-2232E7AF07BB.jpeg
    33.2 KB · Views: 109
  • C81ABB34-3E20-4065-83BE-3BEF4A053BDE.jpeg
    C81ABB34-3E20-4065-83BE-3BEF4A053BDE.jpeg
    51.7 KB · Views: 106
  • 1CEE65C7-6D1B-4EF5-B186-BCB664D8FD0C.jpeg
    1CEE65C7-6D1B-4EF5-B186-BCB664D8FD0C.jpeg
    61.4 KB · Views: 109
Does the 2*Fs/Qes formula apply to the woofer in a 3 way synergy horn? To the chagrin of the original designer I’m looking into using an alternate woofer for the parts express speaker gallery synergy horn.

Keep in mind that in the era of 3D printing, you can use a lot of midranges and midbasses which wouldn't work otherwise.

My current project uses the $12 MCM 55-1870 and I'm getting it to play up to 1500Hz when "technically" it should only work up to 173Hz.

So I'm getting it to play way WAY higher than expected, by using a 3D printed phase plug.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Keep in mind that in the era of 3D printing, you can use a lot of midranges and midbasses which wouldn't work otherwise.

My current project uses the $12 MCM 55-1870 and I'm getting it to play up to 1500Hz when "technically" it should only work up to 173Hz.

So I'm getting it to play way WAY higher than expected, by using a 3D printed phase plug.
So true! I made a volume filler for my lower mids and I haven’t even tried the raw driver on the horn yet. I figured it couldn’t hurt the response and it randomized the path length to the port.
 

Attachments

  • 1E19EB23-C49A-40A0-A7D1-0AF6D2DB4F92.jpeg
    1E19EB23-C49A-40A0-A7D1-0AF6D2DB4F92.jpeg
    269.3 KB · Views: 170
  • F44CBE9D-60B2-4B1D-A86F-25AA61DFBB61.jpeg
    F44CBE9D-60B2-4B1D-A86F-25AA61DFBB61.jpeg
    626.7 KB · Views: 160
  • 4B39CF2E-4B44-4844-9CFE-D55C0EA88176.jpeg
    4B39CF2E-4B44-4844-9CFE-D55C0EA88176.jpeg
    342.9 KB · Views: 172
  • 69801729-D1EB-4381-8004-06CA1959DCEC.jpeg
    69801729-D1EB-4381-8004-06CA1959DCEC.jpeg
    273.6 KB · Views: 179
  • A50EB496-B7D3-4E02-9CF3-3F718F0316A0.jpeg
    A50EB496-B7D3-4E02-9CF3-3F718F0316A0.jpeg
    216.7 KB · Views: 188
  • 19B7AFB9-662B-426D-835F-9344E50C1628.jpeg
    19B7AFB9-662B-426D-835F-9344E50C1628.jpeg
    818.6 KB · Views: 179
  • FFD87D0A-5B77-42AA-83D6-A1580E39AA2A.jpeg
    FFD87D0A-5B77-42AA-83D6-A1580E39AA2A.jpeg
    426.5 KB · Views: 176
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
My current project uses the $12 MCM 55-1870 and I'm getting it to play up to 1500Hz when "technically" it should only work up to 173Hz.

So I'm getting it to play way WAY higher than expected, by using a 3D printed phase plug.
Reducing VTC by filling the cone profile of a 5" should make it reach into the >1kHz range, what "technically" would low pass a 5" driver in a MEH to only 173Hz?

What phase plug design are you using for the MCM 55-1870 to reach 1500Hz?