John Curl's Blowtorch preamplifier part II

Status
Not open for further replies.
Member
Joined 2004
Paid Member
Only if encoded into the source. Nice technical overview, looks like streaming the whole 9 yards will require 18GB/s:eek:.

UHD 101: Demystifying 4K, UHD Blu Ray, wide color gamut, HDR, 4:4:4, 18Gbps and the rest! - Acoustic Frontiers

Just spent a few hours verifying the 18 Gbps performance of a Samsung to Samsung. Actually testing cables. When the source content is good its really good. Youtube is a great source for 4K 60Hz HDR content, however not all the content is what it says it is. Need a decent connection.

Richard, did Comcast pull fiber to your house in Cool? They don't have it in most of the US markets? https://business.comcast.com/about-us/our-network Judging from quotes I got for a custom drop, 1000' was $20K. Your extravagance is awesome.
 
Wrong term "streaming" I meant the HDMI BW even hard to do 15'.

HDMI 2.0 has 3x6Gbps channels, which aggregated could theoretically provide 18Gbps. I'll buy it when I'll see some credible reports on the 2.0 throughput, for the moment it is all marketing wishful thinking fluff. Migrating from HDMI 1.4 to 2.0 in legacy devices is a nightmare, if at all possible.

P.S. Oh, and football sucks at 60fps, anything under 240fps is hurting my eyes. IMO 60fps is for quasi-static imagery like National Geographic documentaries.
 
Last edited:
So does a Patek-Philippe Grand watch etc etc etc.

You're only making the case for high end audio being fashion.

My cell phone gets regularly updated from cell towers on a regular basis to keep the time pretty dang close to PST. Magnificently better than any amazingly well designed mechanical watch, even if there is a simple delight in having the wrong time but a statement piece of metal on you wrist. (I think mechanical watches are super cool)

And while my cell phone is fancier than some of the curmudgeons on this forum, it's by no means "high end". :D
 
But, of course it will cost a lot. So does a Patek-Philippe Grand watch etc etc etc. I dont care if only wealthy can afford the best. Is that a reason that it should not be done? Pls.
-RNM

Watches are a very bad example, the best IMO is the correct time easily achieved by a cheap embedded GPS receiver the rest is pure jewelry. The excess strokes the egos of the usual narcissistic crowd of wank*rs. We have customers that want the health sensors adapted to $xxxx shoes because their clients would never put anything less than a Rolex on their wrists.
 
Last edited:
Disabled Account
Joined 2012
You're only making the case for high end audio being fashion.

My cell phone gets regularly updated from cell towers on a regular basis to keep the time pretty dang close to PST. Magnificently better than any amazingly well designed mechanical watch, even if there is a simple delight in having the wrong time but a statement piece of metal on you wrist. (I think mechanical watches are super cool)

And while my cell phone is fancier than some of the curmudgeons on this forum, it's by no means "high end". :D

Sorry but there IS quality at a high level in those watches. Cheap-o wont last 200 years. Nothing to compare in Audio-land

-RM
 
Disabled Account
Joined 2012
You're only making the case for high end audio being fashion.

My cell phone gets regularly updated from cell towers on a regular basis to keep the time pretty dang close to PST. Magnificently better than any amazingly well designed mechanical watch, even if there is a simple delight in having the wrong time but a statement piece of metal on you wrist. (I think mechanical watches are super cool)

And while my cell phone is fancier than some of the curmudgeons on this forum, it's by no means "high end". :D

Ok Cell phone then.... who makes the Best cell phone.... someone does. That is what audio needs... the Best in our neck of the woods.

-RM
 
Status
Not open for further replies.