Golden Ears - a blessing or a curse

Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
Nah we can do it all digitally. But there is an industry set up to make people buy the BS. The truth is there is nothing analog that can't be perfectly emulated digitally. Remember I come from the world of analog and from an industry that would rather not hear me say that. I have developed however an allergy to BS and I stomp on it like the roach that it is.
 
Last edited:
There are a lot of policies. So you see gain riding........its not strictly compression now is it? (-: its organic man, its cool.

No, that would be compression.

It's just that I'm always seeing it said that compression is essential, but if I stick a mic into my PC sound card, set the gain control appropriately and record myself playing the piano, it sounds fine (audio quality-wise!). I'm pretty sure I could sneak a digital recorder into a classical concert and record it from my seat in the audience and it would also sound fine. No deliberate compression. I'm perfectly willing to believe that if a label says "Original Dynamics", it means it.
 
Some things are fairly easy to record very well without any compression, other things need either compression or truly exceptional players.

Electric guitar is one of the easy ones and the more the player cranks up his amp the easier it is since the guitar amp itself already compresses the signal.
Electronic keyboards are also quite easy.

Electric bass almost always needs a compressor on it unless you are James Jamerson and so do the vast majority of singers.

Drums are somewhere in between, usually ok to record without and add some in the mix later. Very much depends on the drummer.

At least that's how it worked for me.
 
In my case, I surely can listen to 13KHz, I self test it, in fact I can distinguish when a CRT TV is running free or locked to a station by hearing the sound of magnetostriction in the Flyback's core. But I can't recognize a la440 from a la432 or a untuned guitar or piano.

When I was a kid I could easily hear the line oscillator in a TV. I could also easily tell if a program was live, film or video tape simply by the sound quality. Now my hearing drops like a stone at 12KHz.

Cheers

Ian
 
My guess is that it is difficult to record a full symphony orchestra without compression, at least for some pieces. Single flute vs. whole orchestra? However, compression should be the minimum necessary to fit the program dynamic range into the recorder dynamic range while maintaining reasonable signal to noise ratio. This is how it was done before the loudness wars started.
 
My guess is that it is difficult to record a full symphony orchestra without compression, at least for some pieces.

What's the sound level in a quiet hall? 25dBA perhaps? That would be with no people. Peak levels near the front might be 110dBA. So it seems that from the recording end, this isn't impossible. Playback might be another story, of course, but as you've pointed out before, the compression should be done on that side so that those of us who have high dynamic range systems can enjoy the playing un-emasculated.
 
Frank, with a delta sigma DAC the piano often sounds very bad. I expect it is just easier to hear the artifacts when a piano are used due to the broad frequency spectrum and the harmonic structure it have.
This is a 'known' problem - abraxalito is very strong on this. Trouble is, the S-D DACs have very long warm-up times, IME. From cold, they sound pretty shocking - the treble is dead as a doornail. Only solution I've found so far is to thrash them for at least an hour or so, and then they steadily come to life. Once fully conditioned they're fine from then on ... and if anything keep slightly improving ...
 
Thanks goodness someone has mentioned this. I did have this argument with fas42 before.

Here: http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/multi-way/120847-what-causes-listening-fatigue-28.html#post3565148
And my answer here, http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/multi-way/120847-what-causes-listening-fatigue-28.html#post3565192, still stands.

The number of miserable attempts by ultra-expensive hifi gear I've heard over the years, trying to do piano - they're so off the mark, it's quite painful ...

Edit: I might just point to my very crude bit of recording to demonstrate this point, http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/blog...diophile-perhaps-just-me-has-gone-before.html, done on the el cheapo HT system - apologies for the limitations of the recorder ...
 
Last edited:
If a real piano is playing at a distance, and you walk towards it, there is certain subjective experience for your hearing as you do so.
Aaaaah yes, the number of times I have walked towards a piano in my life.

subjective
Finally, fas has hit the nail on the head. It is SUBJECTIVE, meaning probably you alone experience it and what ever "changes" you hear are inside your head. Many have tried to point out the causes of this, e.g. confirmation bias, but you have demonstrated an uncompromising alienation from reason and any attempt to accept well established errors in human thinking that can affect all of us (as well as re-writing the laws of physics).
 
The rewriting of the laws of physics is always the interesting one ... :)

The process is simple: real piano playing at other end of house, you walk towards the sound until you're next to the instrument; next step, put on a piano recording to match that volume, should sound 'right' from the other end of the house; then, walk up to the speakers and that experience should be the same as for the real piano. Most systems don't do that well, a few will ...

If the universe will explode because that comes to pass, I apologise ... no galaxies were injured while conducting this thought experiemnt ....
 
The process is simple: real piano playing at other end of house, you walk towards the sound until you're next to the instrument; next step, put on a piano recording to match that volume, should sound 'right' from the other end of the house; then, walk up to the speakers and that experience should be the same as for the real piano. Most systems don't do that well, a few will ...
Everything about this scenario is different, as is expecting them to sound the same. (And what Pano said.)
 
Everything about this scenario is different, as is expecting them to sound the same. (And what Pano said.)
I don't expect them to sound the same, I intend for them to create the same experience. When a system reproduces in a fashion that creates lifelike sound, it works everywhere, you don't have to be in a precise spot to "hear" it - one can walk around the house, and the sound experience is consistent, the illusion always sustains.

Probably everyone who doesn't "get it" should experience such a system working, and then will start to understand, and appreciate, what the differences are ...
 
Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.