John Curl's Blowtorch preamplifier part II

Status
Not open for further replies.
Hi Dan, Nice piece of kit, good to see you are putting your money where your ears are.
Much interested in further results. I hope you will be able to objectify your findings by doing some controlled listening tests.
One question I have is about your suspicion that 55 Hz would be better than 50 or 60. What is the reasoning behind this?. I can imagine that a marginally designed transformer with a core that saturates @50Hz might benefit from more cycles per second. But why would 55 be better than 60 Hz?
Yeah, cool piece of gear for $221.50....$4k+ from used test equipment vendors.
55Hz is a fundamental musical note...there are no multiples of 50Hz or 60Hz in the musical scale according to this chart - Note Frequencies .
Like I said this is preliminary informal testing but so far the subjective results hold true.

Dan.
 
Max Headroom said:
Preliminary findings so far, confirming suspicion is that neither 50Hz or 60Hz are actually ideal on gear with less than perfect power supply/earthing arrangements.
Switching to 55Hz causes an immediately subjective cleansing of the sound, reducing a veil of intermods and harshness.
A decent recording should not have noticeable amounts of mains hum, unless it comes from guitar amps. If present, recording hum may cause beats with playback hum which is likely to be at a slightly different frequency - maybe up to 0.2Hz or so. This could test the subsonic performance of the equipment, causing IM. Shifting these beats and/or IM to 5Hz could make a difference. Whether better or worse I would not like to guess.

You could have hours of fun with that kit!
 
Different Difference Frequencies....

A decent recording should not have noticeable amounts of mains hum, unless it comes from guitar amps. If present, recording hum may cause beats with playback hum which is likely to be at a slightly different frequency - maybe up to 0.2Hz or so. This could test the subsonic performance of the equipment, causing IM. Shifting these beats and/or IM to 5Hz could make a difference. Whether better or worse I would not like to guess.
Good points, though I don't think the issue is particularly to do with recorded hum, although this is a factor, hence my comment of 60Hz recordings sounding less bad with 60Hz power, ditto 50Hz rec/pb.
I have not yet tried 50Hz/60Hz, +/- say 0.2Hz but this is already on the agenda.
I am thinking that the issue is more to do with playback equipment psu ripple and lack of PSRR/bad earthing interacting (IM) with musical frequencies.
The frequency chart that I referenced is not set in stone...there are tunings slightly different to the standard 440Hz 'A' reference.
The Kikusui has 0.01Hz resoloution, and this may be useful to really fine tune into particular recordings....I may have to break out my Stax electrostatic headphones to really home in on the artefacts and find a best null AC frequency.
If all systems had perfect supplies and infinite PSRR this would all be moot...right now I am exploring this distortion mechanism in 'normal' systems.

You could have hours of fun with that kit!
Haha, yes many hours of educational fun for all involved...so far my system just sounds that bit cleaner, more musical and 'correct'.
Much more time wasting to come ;).

Dan.
 
Same, But Different....

Shifting these beats and/or IM to 5Hz could make a difference. Whether better or worse I would not like to guess.
WRT to 55Hz, shifting the supply +/- 5Hz for a particular recording makes a subtle difference, similar, but different.
I need more listening to characterise the difference.

This is revealing/interesting...swapping phase of particular harmonics changes the waveform...and the sound.
Fourier Series Applet


Dan.
 
It probably IS possible to eliminate the effect of a small change in frequency, but WHY did the original design have this sensitivity?

You assume it did. Fortunately, Max is bright enough and open-minded enough to realize that he has more work to do before he can claim that the audibility actually is "real." If it is, then it's straightforward to figure out why- for example, a marginal power transformer or insufficient ripple filtering. If it isn't, he can move on and leave the Tinkerbell stuff to others.
 
Member
Joined 2004
Paid Member
Do not make the assumption that the power supply is the only pathway for the powerline related noise to affect the audio system. many things from transformer vibration to magnetic fields from power cords getting into the circuitry could have an effect on the audio. Some of those may be much greater than we generally expect.

The PSaudio power plant has many of these capabilities as well.

Separating the possibilities is a lot of work. And the fans running in the next room could have as much impact (white noise floor from the air movement masking other stuff) as the power frequency. There are many hours of experiments ahead and then proper validation (even the horrid DBT).

Sometimes these discoveries are more a curse than a revelation if you take them seriously.
 
Interesting Max. I have no idea WHY it should make a difference, but I believe you. This is how we find out new things. We have to TRY, not just presume that we know everything that will work in advance.
There's no magic involved, John. I've already mentioned have done simulations of what happens in a power amp when the whole path is modelled, from imperfect, conventionally distorted mains power fed through real world power supply components, with all their well known parasitics, to the voltage rails of circuitry with so-so PSRR, working under load.

Perhaps the big surprise is that the sound still sounds reasonable, most of the time, :D ....
 
Could it be that the 5Hz differential acts in a way which isolates the other (noisy) equipment in the house/area? IF so, then a lot of grunge is kept away from the system.

A few years ago I disconnected every electrical circuit in the house - with the exception of the sound chain - by throwing the circuit breakers. The effect was obvious and gave similar results to those given above. I then had a new very heavy spur, with a hard wire fuse, direct from the el supply board for the house, along with a proper dedicated external earth for the audio alone. That exercise was well worth the effort and the costs involved.
 
Bog Standard.....

Max, do your active speakers have a switched power supply or a mains transformer? Just trying to figure it out. I can follow your logic, but have questions too.
Standard toroid transformer/rect/caps driving LM3886 amplifiers.
Line level/crossover stages hanging off LM7815/7915 regulators.
B2031 - PICS.jpg
View attachment B2031 - AMPS PSU.pdf
View attachment B2031 - LINE LEVEL.pdf

Dan.
 
Totally Conventional...

It probably IS possible to eliminate the effect of a small change in frequency, but WHY did the original design have this sensitivity? That is what we have to pursue.
Hi John, see my above post, including schematics.
These boxes run simplest PSU arrangements possible, so AC line dependency is to be expected IMO/IME.

Dan.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, It Is A Wonder....

There's no magic involved, John. I've already mentioned have done simulations of what happens in a power amp when the whole path is modelled, from imperfect, conventionally distorted mains power fed through real world power supply components, with all their well known parasitics, to the voltage rails of circuitry with so-so PSRR, working under load.

Perhaps the big surprise is that the sound still sounds reasonable, most of the time, :D ....
Yes.....that is the point of my buying this box.
Ability to provide variable frequency clean AC is one reason, experimenting with adding repeatable various amounts and kinds of 'dirt' is another reason.

Dan.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.