If I looked into the cockpit of a commercial airliner and saw that, I would run the other way!
I check and there is no short on the input.
Connect the 2 test speakers without any problem on switch on or off.
I think the overhead ceiling fan may contribute to the wandering bias as the bias current varies with the temperature of the heatsink.
Thanks NP for the design and the forum members
kp93300
Connect the 2 test speakers without any problem on switch on or off.
I think the overhead ceiling fan may contribute to the wandering bias as the bias current varies with the temperature of the heatsink.
Thanks NP for the design and the forum members
kp93300
Yep, for this reason I placed the thermistors (M3 screw-in types) 4cm from the Powerfet in the heatsink. Placing them very close to (or even on) the Fets resulted in some slow thermal drift, and a offset of +/- 10mV. Now my F5 is very, very stable
.Succes!Yep, for this reason I placed the thermistors (M3 screw-in types) 4cm from the Powerfet in the heatsink. Placing them very close to (or even on) the Fets resulted in some slow thermal drift, and a offset of +/- 10mV. Now my F5 is very, very stable
So placing the thermsitor 4cm away worked better than placing them closer?
Yes, in my case (each Powerfet has its own heatsink) placing the thermistors directly on the fet's gave some thermal hysteresis (slowly drifting bias per FET). As the N- and P channel fet differ in thermal behaviour you automaticly get the difference in drift as offset on the output. Quit dificult to calculate or simulate, just trie! I used the heatsinks as as some sort of thermal buffer (low deltaT/s). Anyhow, it's worth playing around with the thermistors place and mounting!
Succes.
Succes.
Just a matter of what works for you and what you think is acceptable in drift/offset. I have some delicate speakers and I like my amps to be stable, no matter what the ambient temp is, and how long they've been on....
In my first setups it did not use any thermistors and each channel settled after something like two hours but. Offset during startup was in the range of +/- 30mV.
I make a silly mistake--please help
Well,
I was enjoying wonderful music with my test speakers .
While trying to adjust the bias and the dc offset, there is some spark and now no sound.
The voltage across R12 near to the IRFP 240 is ZERO. The voltage across R 11 near to IRFP 9240 is 24 V !
DC offset is about .2 to .3 V and cannot be adjusted to zero.
What is the likely problem.?
I think I may have create a short across R12 while testing !
kp93300
Well,
I was enjoying wonderful music with my test speakers .
While trying to adjust the bias and the dc offset, there is some spark and now no sound.
The voltage across R12 near to the IRFP 240 is ZERO. The voltage across R 11 near to IRFP 9240 is 24 V !
DC offset is about .2 to .3 V and cannot be adjusted to zero.
What is the likely problem.?
I think I may have create a short across R12 while testing !
kp93300
If you have the full +24V over R11 then R11 is probably broken. The fact that you have "only" 0.2V at the output indicates that each Fet , P and N draw no current and might both be broken. Also check both source resistors.
Yes, it is possible to destroy components and keeping the smoke in...
Perhaps not a topic to discuss in the F5 forum, but lineairity and distortion of (in your case tweeters) are influenced by offset; giving them a bias that especially has its effect on the lineairity of cone/dome suspension and spiders.
To get an idea the relative importance; just measure the voltage on the tweeter at normal playing level. Just +/-30mV??
Perhaps not a topic to discuss in the F5 forum, but lineairity and distortion of (in your case tweeters) are influenced by offset; giving them a bias that especially has its effect on the lineairity of cone/dome suspension and spiders.
To get an idea the relative importance; just measure the voltage on the tweeter at normal playing level. Just +/-30mV??
You are perfectly right. Though i have less than 15mv, i will insert a cap.